Skip to main content

sas - SCSI vs SATA? Is SCSI "actually" better?





Well, I was talking with a guy about servers the other day. I was a
bit shocked whenever I asked him if there was any significant difference between SCSI
and SATA and why he always uses SCSI. (note, I'm not sure if by SCSI he meant
SAS)



He told me that SCSI is always faster and
that the drives are always more reliable.. I mean, this seems like a bold statement.



He told me something about how SCSI will always
be faster than SATA because the OS sends the SCSI (controller?) a request to get a file
and it will build the file inside of the SCSI controller, instead of searching all over
the disk.. which I do not understand how that would work, so I figure it is
BS.



SAS and SATA currently have equivalent data
rate speeds..




Is there
any true backing for his reasoning that SCSI is always faster and more reliable than
SATA?


itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



For SATA,
you need to be careful about using a consumer drive if you are building a RAID
array.



Some power saving features and in the
case of Western Digital, some of their SATA drives have a "deep recovery" process when
an error is detected. These can cause a SATA RAID member to be dropped or marked as
failed if it is unresponsive beyond the timeout
period.



When a SATA RAID5 volume with huge
drives drops a member, it is not uncommon for the rebuild to take several hours. During
this time, performance will be
abysmal.



Western Digital -
difference between Desktop edition and RAID (Enterprise) edition hard
drives?


href="http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1397"
rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1397



href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-Limited_Error_Recovery" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-Limited_Error_Recovery


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...