Skip to main content

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together)



The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014



The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014



I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file



Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same.




The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is




/usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl
-configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl
dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all -update -buildpdf




In the conf directory I have a filed called: awstats.example.com.conf




 # Name of the logfile
LogFile=/home/User/Documents/MergedStats/merged_example.com_access_log
LogType=W
LogFormat=1
SiteDomain="example.com"
HostAliases="REGEX[example\.com$] "
etc...


Everything Seems in order but the generated stats only show stats from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 (The second server's data) I'm not getting the three years data's worth of the first server. At first I thought Awstats was only generating the first month of stats, but the date range is limited to the second server's stats. Even though the merge file contains all of it.




What did I miss?






Update



alxgomz response showed me that the files I wanted were in the dirdata directory I had made. It seems that if you do awstats on a non server it still wants to be served up so I imported those dirdata files to the server however I missing the month of January from the stats. It generated all the way back from 2012 but can't find those records... Could the server maybe not have moved the access logs yet??



Meaning does the main server access_log get parced and spread out to each sub domain by a command or does it Cpanel make all the logs at the same time?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able