Skip to main content

Configuring postfix to fight spam, 2012 edition





EDIT: This question was poorly asked,
later I found another question which answers what i wanted to know: href="https://serverfault.com/questions/17221/spam-prevention-tips-for-postfix">Spam
prevention tips for Postfix



I'm
running a small (20 users, 30 mailman-lists) server with postfix. I think it's
configured fine, more or less. I spent 2 days reading up on all kinds of material on
postfix configuration, but I couldn't find any list of measures that are actually safe
to enable/disable. For about every configuration option i found there were some people
pro and some against it.



This is my postfix
configuration, can you give me simple measures on what to
improve?



alias_database =
hash:/etc/aliases, hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases
alias_maps =
hash:/etc/aliases,
hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases

append_dot_mydomain =
no
biff = no
config_directory =
/etc/postfix
disable_vrfy_command = yes
home_mailbox =
Mail/
inet_interfaces = all
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/spamc -e
/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver
mailbox_size_limit = 0
mydestination =
localhost, .at, .at
myhostname =
.at

mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8
[::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128
myorigin =
/etc/mailname
readme_directory = no
recipient_delimiter =
+
smtpd_banner = $myhostname ESMTP
smtpd_delay_reject =
yes
smtpd_helo_required = yes
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated,
reject_unauth_destination
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable =
yes
smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname

smtpd_sasl_path
= private/auth
smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot
smtpd_tls_CAfile =
/etc/ssl-certs/startssl.chained.crt.pem
smtpd_tls_cert_file =
/etc/ssl-certs/startssl.our.crt.pem
smtpd_tls_key_file =
/etc/ssl-certs/private/startssl.key.pem
smtpd_tls_received_header =
yes
smtpd_use_tls = yes
soft_bounce = no
tls_random_source
=
dev:/dev/urandom



Also
recently I read something about BATV, and from reading my /var/log/mail.info i think i
have quite a few messages being invalid bounces.



Answer




check this tutorial. it's getting quite regularly updated - i used it ~5
yrs ago, i used it ~half year ago. it tells about the whole ecosystem [amavis,
spamassasin, dcc, pyzor, razor and more], not just postfix.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able