Other domains on shared server showing my webpages

I own a website (gosportweather.co.uk) which is hosted by the same company as other websites on a shared server. The problem is I am noticing that these other websites appear to be showing my webpages under their domain names. At first I thought someone had copied my pages however running the domains through whois shows them all as being on the same ip with the same name servers as my site and so I can't help but wonder if my host has got something wrong at their end.

When attempting to visit the sites chrome gives the following warning:

NET::ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID

This server could not prove that it is www.example.com; its security certificate is from www.gosportweather.co.uk. This may be caused by a misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.

I have changed the domain in the error above from the original to example.com in case it is a legit site as I don't want to damage their reputation.

The certificates all appear to have expired but I am confused as to why the error is occurring.

I have noticed that when I update my webpage the pages under the other domains also update.

My host recent acquired the servers from another company and so I wonder if they have misconfigured them. I have been having DNS issues with error: err_name_not_resolved on multiple networks and my host tried to fix this by updating the name servers about 24hrs ago but the site is still not being found on some networks.

Please could someone advise me on what I should do to fix this. What is likely to be causing these problems and are they connected?

Many Thanks,

Ross

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog