Skip to main content

ftp - Are there any free software to test web server?




I wrote own http server. Are there any free software, test packages or toolset to validate whether it complies fully or partially with HTTP 1.0 (rfc 1945). And moreover it'd great if this software could estimate http performance and check for potential security issues. The same is wanted from this software in respect of FTP compliance validation.


Answer



Lots of questions here. While I'm sure lots of people will tell you their tool does everything if only you will buy it, there are very few tools available which make a reasonable attempt at any one of these.




For the security side of things, assuming that you are only interested in serving of static content, there is a list of useful software here.



For capacity testing you could use ab which ships with apache. You might also consider scripting more complex interactions using loadrunner ($$$) or http::Recorder and www::mechanize



Most of the large software packages available as source code come with automatic testing scripts (usually a target in the Makefile, e.g. 'make test') but the Apache build instructions don't mention this - might be worth downloading the src and configuring it to see if it does have test scripts included which could be adapted.



As for performance testing/monitoring - IME there's nothing currently available which is any good (and I include Oracle's Grid Control, BMC Patrol, Google Analytics and a large number of other products in the 'not any good' category). Personally I'm using a home-grown solution which relies on very detailled logging of URL generation (have a look at mod_log_config %D option and mod_log_firstbyte).



One area I've not studied in great depth is passive monitoring - there are tools like vantage agentless but these are very, VERY expensive. PastMon may meet your requirements (its good and its free) but you're going to need some specialist and expensive hardware to run it on if you expect to measure what happens when your webserver reaches saturation.




HTH



C.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able