There's this Cisco 2500 with one V.35 port going to an HDSL DCE, and the ethernet port to a Cisco PIX; there are also other IPs (subnet 80.something) in the configuration on the serial side that are used to route traffic to the DSL provider.
I'm wondering if it is possible to remove the PIX and move everything on the Cisco 2500 - I can usually manage to do this when the public IP is on the wan-facing port and the private IP on the lan one, but I don't know how could I add a private IP to the 2500 and use the public one for nat when they're both on the same internal interface.
The current config for the 2500 looks like:
ip subnet-zero
!
interface Ethernet0
description connected to PIX
ip address 217.x.x.1 255.255.255.248
ip nat inside
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip mroute-cache
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip mroute-cache
encapsulation frame-relay
bandwidth 1024
no cdp enable
!
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
ip address 80.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
ip nat outside
frame-relay interface-dlci xxx IETF
bandwidth 1024
no ip directed-broadcast
no cdp enable
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0.1
The PIX has 217.x.x.2 on its WAN interface and uses the 2500's 217.x.x.1 as default gateway.
I would like to remove the PIX and connect the LAN directly to the Cisco 2500, which would have 192.168.1.1/24 on its Ethernet port and NAT everything out from one of the 217.x.x.X IPs. After that I will probably want to also add other static IPs to the Cisco from the 217.x.x.X/29 subnet and use them to portforward some services to internal servers.
Answer
There's lots of documentation on cisco.com about NAT services.
Try starting at:
As a general guide, you would want 'ip nat outside' on s0/0.1, 'ip nat inside' on e0.
You would make a NAT pool using your 217.x.x.1/29 addresses, that things on the inside could use. They would not appear on an interface anymore.
Comments
Post a Comment