Skip to main content

domain name system - Best Practices in Speeding-up DNS Propagation












I
recently changed nameservers and it has been 24 hours since.
Some of my
visitors are complaining they are still viewing the old site while some are already
seeing the new site. Is there any way to speed-up the DNS propagation without updating
the hosts file of each of my
visitors?




Are there any best
practices when it comes to changing nameservers to minimize this
problem?



Answer




DNS records doesn't propagate in the sense
that they aren't "pushed" from your server to other resolvers. What actually happens is
that when other DNS servers look up your domain, they cache the record for X
seconds
so that they don't have to do another lookup for subsequent requests.
X seconds should be determined by the
TTL value on the record when it was retrieved from your name server. If you've already
changed the address there's nothing you can do but sit and wait. If you had planned this
in advance, you could have lowered the TTL
value.



Some larger DNS resolvers cache longer
than the TTL, which is a violation of the relevant RFCs (but they don't care). If you
can track this issue down to a few name servers, you can email the operators and ask
them to invalidate the cache for your zone so that they'll stop using the cached (old)
record.



Honestly, though, unless this goes on
for an extended period of time, it's probably just as well that you sit tight and wait
and plan a better migration for next time, since the damage is already
done.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able