Skip to main content

windows server 2012 - HP ML350 G5 146gb 15k SAS 3.5" HDD Upgrade Options

itemprop="text">

Okay, spent a lot of time researching
this and still can't quite find the exact answer I'm looking for. I have an HP ML350 G5
with (4) 146gb 1 port 15k SAS 3.5" hdd's and an HP E200i controller/original mobo
413984-001/Dual Xeon 5130's @ 2ghz/4gb ram.



I'd
like to buy the largest hdd's possible to replace the current drives (no data to
preserve-fresh OS install) and fill all 6 empty slots. I "think" I read on another post
on here that it's possible to go down to the 2.5" SAS drives? and then I could install 8
of them but I'm not totally sure on that. Any help would definitely be appreciated.



Speed of the drives is NOT important as it will
just be used for data archiving but I do still want to use Raid to protect the data. Is
Raid 5 the best choice for this configuration? Also, anyone know how much Ram this can
be upgraded to? I checked on Ebay and it shows kits available with massive amounts of
RAM but I want to be sure this old server can actually handle that much before I order
it. (any other tips to help me max out this server would be much appreciated)! My
ultimate goal is to achieve the most storage space I can.



Answer




rel="nofollow noreferrer">Alway look up the Quickspecs for your HP
product.




The server
supports 6 x 3.5" disks.



Is it not worth
changing the drive cage of the server to accommodate 2.5"
disks.



You can safely use 2TB SATA or nearline
SAS disks. If you use SATA, the link speed on that E200i will be 1.5Gbps. SAS will be
3.0Gbps.



href="https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/ydi6i/dell_raid_5_is_no_longer_recommended_for_any/"
rel="nofollow noreferrer">RAID 5
sucks!



The
RAM depends on the motherboard
revision and processor type of the server. It will either be 16GB RAM for the
earliest versions of the product (2006-era dual-core) and 32GB for later revisions
(2007-era quad-core).




Mind you, this
server has been end-of-life for 6 years. Embarking on a new project with it may not be
the best move if you can avoid it.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more