Skip to main content

Two-Way SSL Authentication with Apache 2.2 and OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips

I have a CentOS 6 server running Apache 2.2.15 with
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips. I am trying to setup two-way SSL authentication for a specific
location in my web root. A 3rd party has provided both a public (plain-text) and private
(binary) certificate.



I need some guidance on
how to include both the public and private certs to get the handshaking working, as I am
getting the following
error:






Re-negotiation handshake failed: Not accepted by
client!?




Here's
what I have in my /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf file pertaining to this
section:



            /api/path/>
SSLCipherSuite
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL
SSLCACertificateFile
/etc/pki/tls/private/public.cer

SSLVerifyClient
require
SSLVerifyDepth 10
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars +ExportCertData
+OptRenegotiate



Admittedly
I am not an SSL expert. I know enough to get certs installed and working. I have turned
logginf to 'debug' level. I have tried to follow these
guides:



href="http://www.stefanocapitanio.com/configuring-two-way-authentication-ssl-with-apache/"
rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://www.stefanocapitanio.com/configuring-two-way-authentication-ssl-with-apache/




href="http://www.cafesoft.com/products/cams/ps/docs32/admin/ConfiguringApache2ForSSLTLSMutualAuthentication.html"
rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://www.cafesoft.com/products/cams/ps/docs32/admin/ConfiguringApache2ForSSLTLSMutualAuthentication.html



Thanks
in advance!



Full ssl.conf
file:



LoadModule ssl_module
modules/mod_ssl.so
Listen 443

SSLPassPhraseDialog
builtin


SSLSessionCache
shmcb:/var/cache/mod_ssl/scache(512000)
SSLSessionCacheTimeout
300

SSLMutex default

SSLRandomSeed startup
file:/dev/urandom 256
SSLRandomSeed connect builtin
#SSLRandomSeed
startup file:/dev/random 512
#SSLRandomSeed connect file:/dev/random
512

#SSLRandomSeed connect file:/dev/urandom
512

SSLCryptoDevice builtin
#SSLCryptoDevice
ubsec

DocumentRoot
"/var/www/html/staging-site"
ServerName
staging.site.com:443
ErrorLog logs/ssl_error_log
TransferLog
logs/ssl_access_log
LogLevel debug


SSLEngine
on
SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 -SSLv3
SSLCipherSuite
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT:!SSLv2:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW

SSLCertificateFile
/etc/pki/tls/certs/cert.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile
/etc/pki/tls/private/private.key
#SSLCertificateChainFile
/etc/pki/tls/certs/server-chain.crt
SSLCACertificateFile
/etc/pki/tls/certs/rapidssl.crt


#SSLVerifyClient
require
#SSLVerifyDepth 10

# Access
Control:
#
#SSLRequire ( %{SSL_CIPHER} !~
m/^(EXP|NULL)/ \
# and %{SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_O} eq "Snake Oil, Ltd." \
#
and %{SSL_CLIENT_S_DN_OU} in {"Staff", "CA", "Dev"} \
# and %{TIME_WDAY} >=
1 and %{TIME_WDAY} <= 5 \
# and %{TIME_HOUR} >= 8 and %{TIME_HOUR} <=
20 ) \

# or %{REMOTE_ADDR} =~
m/^192\.76\.162\.[0-9]+$/
#


/path/api/>
SSLCipherSuite
ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL

SSLCACertificateFile /etc/pki/tls/private/3rdpartyprivate.cer
SSLVerifyClient
require
SSLVerifyDepth 10
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars +ExportCertData
+OptRenegotiate



# SSL Engine
Options:
#SSLOptions +FakeBasicAuth +ExportCertData
+StrictRequire


SSLOptions +StdEnvVars

"/var/www/cgi-bin">
SSLOptions
+StdEnvVars



# SSL Protocol
Adjustments:
SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" \
nokeepalive
ssl-unclean-shutdown \
downgrade-1.0
force-response-1.0

# Per-Server Logging:
CustomLog
logs/ssl_request_log \
"%t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\"
%b"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able