Skip to main content

amazon ec2 - Ubuntu 9.10 cron script 'ec2-consistent-snapshot' unable to execute and access files

itemprop="text">

I have a Ubuntu 9.10 image running on
Amazon EC2 and I've setup a backup script
ec2-consisten-snapshot.



I'm able to run the
script from SSH, and everything works
peachy.




sudo
ec2-consistent-snapshot --mysql --xfs-filesystem /vol vol-xxxxxxx
>>/mnt/backup.log
2>&1


However
when I schedule a cron job in sudo crontab -e, the script runs but gives me errors.



12 18 4 2 *
ec2-consistent-snapshot --mysql --xfs-filesystem /vol vol-xxxxxxx
>>/mnt/backup.log
2>&1





ec2-consistent-snapshot: ERROR: Can't find AWS access key or secret access key
at /usr/bin/ec2-consistent-snapshot line 76.
xfs_freeze: cannot unfreeze
filesystem mounted at /vol: Invalid argument
ec2-consistent-snapshot: ERROR:
xfs_freeze -u /vol:
failed(256)




The
AWS access keys are located under $HOME/.awssecret and work fine if you don't run it
from cron



Can someone point me what I need to
do, I've been trying to figure this out for past week.
Also how do I
troubleshoot xfs_freeze that works fine from command
line.




Thank you very much!


style="font-weight: bold;">

Answer




sudo crontab -e
edits root's crontab right? When you say you have $HOME/.awssecret, what is $HOME?
root's home or yours?



You might want to think
about using /etc/cron.d, you can additionally add the name of the user to execute the
script as in these files (e.g. caution: slightly different syntax for the
scripts)



Edit (answering your question in the
comment):



Create a file
/etc/cron.d/myEc2Crontab




make
it contain:



SHELL=/bin/sh
PATH=whatever
you need as your path
12 18 4 2 * root ec2-consistent-snapshot --mysql
--xfs-filesystem /vol vol-xxxxxxx >>/mnt/backup.log
2>&1


note the
added 'root' just after the time specification, prior to your command. This specifies
the user the command runs as.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able