Skip to main content

Active Directory authentication with Apache: why I need to use a full name (user at domain)?

itemprop="text">

We use Apache 2.2 for authentication
against Active Directory.
The configuration is
following:




AuthFormLDAPURL
"ldap://*.*.*.*:389/DC=domain,DC=com?userPrincipalName,sAMAccountName?sub?(objectClass=*)"


Note:
All traces below using WireShark.



I
defined the user john when the CN is equal to the sAMAcountMame
name:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/aWoxE.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



I can authenticate using only john
(sAMAcountMame). Please find below LDAP bind
request:




src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/84bkm.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



LDAP bind
response:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/W1JRb.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



Then I defined the user johnd when the
CN is NOT equal to the sAMAcountMame
name:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/nIb5k.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">




Unfortunately, I can not
authenticate using johnd (sAMAcountMame). Please find below LDAP bind
request:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/lRYR4.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



LDAP bind
response:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/liABx.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



I can authenticate using a full name
jonhd@domain.com. Please find below LDAP bind
request:




src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/l2EC3.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



LDAP bind
response:



src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/jBA9I.jpg" alt="enter image description
here">



Questions:





  1. Why
    I can not authenticate using sAMAcountMame when the CN is NOT equal to the
    sAMAcountMame?

  2. Why I can authenticate using sAMAcountMame
    at domain in this case?

  3. Should we recommend to our users
    always to authenticate using sAMAcountMame at domain to prevent the authentication
    problems?



Thanks for your
help!



Answer




When performing LDAP simple bind, AD does
not try to match the passed name against the sAMAccountName
attribute without any suffixes. However, it could try to find a match against
displayName, which worked for you in the first test (where it
looked like a match against sAMAccountName, because values of
those attributes were the same).



The precise
description of name matching rules used when handling LDAP simple binds can be found in
the Microsoft documentation:

href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223499.aspx" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223499.aspx



Using
UPN is probably more reliable, because displayName might
contain some human-readable string (e.g., full name of a person) and is not guaranteed
to be unique. The DOMAIN\USERNAME form should also be unique, but depend on NetBIOS
domain names, which are considered to be obsolete now.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...