Skip to main content

nginx - Redirect HTTP to HTTPS with ldirectord/LVS

itemprop="text">

We're using LVS for load balancing and
want to do a 301 redirect for http://example.com to rel="nofollow
noreferrer">https://example.com



LVS
is enabling https without issue, but the http real servers are not being added to the
pool (weight of 0).



Does LVS not follow 301
redirects? If not, how do I configure ldirectord to send all HTTP traffic to
HTTPS?



Here is the nginx
config:




server
{
listen 80;
server_name example.com;
return 301
https://example.com$request_uri;
}

server {

listen 443;
ssl on;

ssl_certificate
server.crt;
ssl_certificate_key server.key;
server_name
example.com;

# more
here

}


And
ldirectord.cf looks like
this:




virtual=VIP:80

fallback=127.0.0.1:80
real=10.0.0.7:80 masq 5
real=10.0.0.8:80
masq 5
service=http
request="lvs.htm"

receive="lvs"
virtualhost=example.com

scheduler=wlc

protocol=tcp

checktype=negotiate

virtual=VIP:443

fallback=127.0.0.1:443
real=10.0.0.7:443 masq 5
real=10.0.0.8:443
masq 5
service=https
request="lvs.htm"

receive="lvs"

virtualhost=example.com

scheduler=wlc
protocol=tcp

checktype=negotiate


I
also tried setting my VIP to port 80 and my RIP ports to 443 which resulted in the
servers being added to the pool, but nginx then returns a 400 "The plain HTTP request
was sent to HTTPS port" error.


class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



I was
making this harder than it needed to be.




I modified my nginx.conf as
so:



server {
listen
80;
server_name example.com;

root
/var/www;

location = /lvs.htm {
#do
nothing

}

location / {
return 301
https://example.com$request_uri;

}
}


lvs.htm
resides in /var/www so the location is matched, searching stops and lvs.htm is served
with a 200 response code. LVS adds the server to the pool and when it is hit, nginx
correctly redirects to https with a 301.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able