Skip to main content

permissions - Maintaining Linux file owner and group info in a multi-user system

itemprop="text">

I have a web application running on
Linux (using CentOS 6) using a generic non-root user name, say app1. I've associated all
the files under the folder /home/app1 with that user/group (using chown -R app1:app1) so
it can serve up web pages and write to logs as necessary. When it comes to updates
though I'm trying to figure out how to handle permissions so that I don't need to
constantly run the chown command on the /home/app1 directory. There's a requirement to
log in to the server with a unique id so if devguy1 logs in and copies an update the
files he wrote over now have devguy1 as the owner and group and the app1 won't be able
to read the new file. Devguy1 is part of the app1 group so they can update the app but
not vice versa. I see that there's a way to copy files using cp -p that will preserve
permissions but we're usually using Beyond Compare to move updates from our Dev server
to production which doesn't have that option. Is there a setting on the parent folder
that could make the file keep the app1 owner/group info or is there a way that when a
new user is created that I could add app1 to their group?



Answer




Set the setuid and setgid bits on all of the directories under
/home/app1:



find /home/app1 -type
d -exec chmod ug+s '{}'
+



(See
man find to learn about the find command, and man
chmod
to learn about the setuid and setgid bits.) That causes the user and
group owners to be preserved when new files and directories are created in any of the
existing directories.



I believe there are cases
that will still ignore the suid and sgid bits, like saving to SMB shares, or copying
with permissions intact using cp -p. But for the most part, it
should work.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...