Skip to main content

monitoring - Script to monitor specific processes' memory utilization

itemprop="text">

I have a client I do some remote
server administration work for who recently started a 2-week trial period with New
Relic. They have recently had some performance issues, and also asked me to take a look
at things.



They saw that their memory on one of
their servers was only hitting 50% according to New Relic, and became suspicious that
the memory metrics / graphs were off (and emailed New Relic about
it).



I spent some time this afternoon reviewing
configuration files, CPU / Memory / IO graphs on New Relic, and making some
recommendations.



I'm not convinced that the
memory metrics are wrong. For example, on my client's DB server, New Relic said MySQL
was using (at times) 3,481Mb of RAM. I ran PS to obtain the pid for MySQL, and ran the
following command:




cat
/proc/29313/status


Which
output the following for
VmRSS:



VmRSS: 3566268
kB


(which is 3,482Mb
of RAM)




my.cnf has some settings I
recommended that they tweak (key_buffer_size,
etc...).



[Edit: If
you're curious, this is irrelevant to my question below, but this particular server is
running cPanel and has 32 GB of RAM. It's a dedicated MySQL server and has a number of
databases running on it.]



My question is
regarding whether or not VmRSS is the best metric for monitoring how much memory a
certain process is using. If it is, I'm thinking about writing a script that would run
on cron every 30 seconds or so for about 1-2 weeks, and then review the data. The script
would look something like
this:



$PID = pgrep
mysql
cat /proc/$PID/status | grep VmRSS: >
/var/log/my-custom-process-memory-monitor.log



Is
this a good idea? Can you think of anything better? Why or why not?



Answer




RSS (resident set size) can be unreliable, because processes such as fork() do
copy-on-write paging when allocating memory for the new
process.



I.E if you spawn a process, give it 50M
of memory to play with then fork() the loop 10 times - the RSS size will report a 500MB
memory usage when in actual fact your more likely to be using just over 50M
size.



For non-forking processes RSS should be
generally reliable as far as I could tell.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able