memory difference on top and htop

itemprop="text">

I got a new VPS as my database server.
I installed only mysql and started. After some time(even after shutting down mysql
service), I see only %3-4 of the memory used in htop but according to top I only have
30MB free memory. It has a total of 4GB RAM. I don't know which one to trust. Can
someone explain me the difference of top and htop memory usage and what may be causing
the high usage at top
stats?

thanks.

Answer

It's just the difference of whether you consider memory that contains
discardable data as used or not. The memory is used in the sense that it contains
information that may be useful. But it's free in the sense that the information can
simply be discarded if the memory is needed.

For
example, say you run a program. The executable file that holds the program itself is
still in memory. But that data is not needed at the time. If the program runs again,
however, the information can be used from memory so it doesn't have to be loaded from
disk again. But if that memory is needed for some other purpose, the file data can be
thrown away since it's on the disk. Should this be considered free memory or
not?

The reason so much memory is used is
because free memory is wasted memory. Only memory that is being used can improve
performance. The OS tries to keep as little memory free as possible, only enough to
handle special situations such as bursts of data received from the network. It's not
like if you use only 3GB today you can use 5GB tomorrow. If you only use 3GB today, you
just wasted 1GB.

Comments

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able

Blog

Search This Blog