Skip to main content

linux - Does lshw list the "factory" speed of a memory module or the effective speed and how to find the former?

I hope I phrased this correctly. lshw gives:




         description: DIMM Synchronous 400 MHz (2.5 ns)
product: M378B5773CH0-CH9
vendor: Samsung
physical id: 0
slot: DIMM0
size: 2GiB
width: 64 bits
clock: 400MHz (2.5ns)



And indeed the memory speed is set is set to 800MHz in the BIOS, which I think makes sense since it is a double rate.



On the other hand, Googling strongly suggests that to this product number corresponds the PC3-10600 type, which is 1333MHz, not 800MHz. And this seems to be confirmed in the BIOS, where if I select Auto for memory bus speed, 1333MHz is selected "based on SPD settings".



However in the latter case, the computer does not boot, i.e. the kernel panics, complaining that something attempted to kill the Idle process.



So, I am I am beginning to suspect that I have been given defective memory, the technician that installed saw this, and lowered the bus speed. Is this a possibility?



NEW DEVELOPMENT




The suggestions below have been very helpful, wish I could accept them both. Well, before running the memtest, I had the idea to reset the bios to its default settings, which I had not done on this computer. What do you know? Both the bus clock was set to Auto, i.e. 1333MHz and the computer booted normally, and seems to be able to pass the memtest (didn't let it finish). Before, I could not even get GRUB to load sometimes, and never the system.



So although I was paranoid about being scammed, it was some setting that the retailer en(dis)abled that caused the crashes. What it was, and why they had changed it will probably remain a mystery, since the days when I could understand HALF the options in my BIOS are long gone. :-)



I will post back if there is any more instability. Many thanks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able