Skip to main content

active directory - Remote branches and domain controller

itemprop="text">

I have a very small, but distributed
network. In the central office, there's a Windows Server 2008 R2 VM with a few Linux VMs
running on the same box. There are two client PCs running Windows7. In a remote
location, there is a single client PC, currently connecting into the central office with
OpenVPN via one of the Linux servers.



I would
like to move from Workgroup to Administrative Domain for better group policy control. I
will not be able to justify additional server hardware or Microsoft licenses (those
things are ridiculous) but can easily add more VMs to the existing server.



The way I see it I have a few decisions to
make, each with a few
options.



Which server runs the
domain





  1. Windows
    Server 2008


    • Traditional AD
      solution

    • Can't add a backup controller without another
      license

    • Windows server is also running FTP and AS
      functions; AD servers typically just host
      AD.


  2. One of the Linux
    boxes with Samba)



    • Not the
      traditional AD solution (am I giving up any
      features?)

    • Can easily (read: cheaply) add a backup
      controller

    • If necessary (not ideal), can add a DC at
      remote
      location




How
do I authenticate / authorize the remote
locations





  1. Add
    remote Linux DC at remote location (seems like overkill for one remote
    client)

  2. Somehow connect to the VPN prior to logging in to
    Windows (is this even possible?)

  3. Expose my AD to the
    internet without VPN. (seems like a terrible
    idea)



Are there any
options I'm missing? This has to be a pretty common situation for small businesses, I
can't imagine these IT-less companies are buying multiple WinServer boxes to setup the
traditional solution of a standalone AD, a standalone backup AD, and then another box to
host everything else....



I'm a Linux guy and
have no problem getting my hands dirty, but don't have a wealth of IT experience.


style="font-weight: bold;">

Answer




The ideal solution would be to setup a
site-to-site VPN tunnel and handle all the authentication against the DCs at the main
site. (This would of course, depend on your network gear or any gateway servers you can
set up at each site.)




If you put a
second DC at the remote site, you'll have the same issues with connecting the two sites
so the DCs can talk to each other. And, yeah exposing AD to the public net is all kinds
of worst-idea-ever. And, let me add that using Linux as your secondary DC strikes me as
a very not good idea too. I bet it can be done, but I wouldn't want to be around when
the Windows DC fails and you have to try restoring your only Windows DC. Might be "good
enough" but, well, like I said, I wouldn't trust it, and if I can't trust it, why bother
having it around in the first place?



If you
can't do a site-to-site VPN, depending on the exact VPN software you're using, it's
actually possible to connect a remote client VPN without user context (before logging
into Windows), yes, though I'd suggest that an easier idea would be to allow caching of
the domain credentials and/or a non-domain limited user account. Caching the domain
credentials for a client that only has VPN access can be a bit of a headache when the
password needs changed though, so heads up on
that.



And for what it's worth, the "common"
solution to this problem seems to be to stay with workgroups, and/or cheap out on the IT
admin they hire, as to ensure they end up with a domain that's effed up in more ways
than I can count. So, kudos on taking the initiative to at least try to do it
right.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...