Skip to main content

windows server 2003 monitoring software combining SQL Server monitoring with CPU-IO stats

itemprop="text">

I'm aware this type of question has
been asked many times
before:





But my question
has a twist, I want to monitor a system and correlate CPU - IO stats with SQL Server
usage stats, I want to be able to say that at 13:45 the query "select * from bar where
baz = 'quux'", ran on SQL Server 1, used up to 80% CPU for 6 seconds with an IO load of
6 and an average disk queue of 15.




I
can do this now with a combination of perfmon, SQL Profiler and some custom scripts to
correlate the data. I want some tool to do this all for me
now.



Do I expect too much? Is there a tool which
does things like this?



The usually mentioned
candidates are:





But, as
far as I can tell, none of those have everything I want. Or does some and I've missed
it?



Answer





You're unhappy with the built in
functionality profiler provides where you can combine perfmon data files?



The magic happens in Profiler with the
File->Import Performance Data... option. What this means is you can click on your
perform graph (where your CPU is spiking) and profiler will jump to the corresponding
capture that was happening at that moment.



This
was a new feature introduced in SQL Server
2005.



href="http://www.sqlteam.com/article/integrating-profiler-and-perfmon-log-files"
rel="nofollow noreferrer">check this out



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...