Skip to main content

windows - DNS requests failing from computers that can ping DNS server

I have a situation where computers in some of our remote
offices from time to time lose the ability to use our DNS server (in head office) to
resolve hostnames. The offices are connected via VPN using Cisco ASA 5505 (VPNclient
config rather than Site to Site) connecting back to an ASA 5510 at head
office.



Ping to the IP address of the DNS server
works. But nslookup will get a "no response from server" message. Computers in other
locations can use DNS fine.



This is an
intermittent problem. One day/hour it works, another it doesn't. Other offices connected
in the same way work when another doesn't.



No
config changes have been made on routers around the time we see the
problem.



The DNS server that drops out for the
clients is on our private address space in the 172.16.0.0/12 network. The ASA 5505s and
the clients behind them are each in a 10.6.x.0/24 private address
space.




Each ASA 5505 has its DHCP
server configured to assign addresses and DNS config to clients behind them -these are
generally Windows XP clients, with a growing number of Windows 7. The primary DNS is our
one in the 172.16.0.0/12 space, the secondary is 8.8.8.8 to allow access to the internet
in case the VPN tunnel drops for any
reason.



Some users have reported that the
problem goes away after doing a repair connection in Windows XP. I think this could be
caused by the DNS cache being flushed as part of this - the Windows DNS cache makes the
intermittent problem look less so because it caches failed lookups as well as successful
ones. However, it is possible some other aspect of Windows is involved. Windows 7
clients have also had the same problem.



Any
pointers on deeper troubleshooting, or anyone else found this?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more