Skip to main content

postfix - What settings should my email server be mindful of to avoid bounce back from major email providers?

itemprop="text">

So I think my
postfix+dovecot+roundcube+postfixadmin+sasl+spamassassin+amavisd-new+postgrey setup is
working correctly. I can send out emails to certain domain names. Receiving definitely
works; however, when i send out emails to hotmail for instance I get a bounce back. Even
worse yahoo doesn't even bounce it just kills the email all
together.



I don't think I have been blacklisted
or anything (maybe I have been? I don't even know.) so I am assuming that these
companies don't like that some of my settings don't match up in my headers or something.
Perhaps I have an IP or Server name instead of domain name somewhere or something. I am
not sure.



Also is there a way to confirm that I
have password protected SMTP? I am pretty sure it is; however, How can I be
sure?



Here is the bounce back
email:






This is the mail system at host XXXXXXX.




I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be
delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.




For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.



If you do so, please include this problem
report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.




 The mail system



:
said:
550 OU-001 Mail rejected by Windows Live Hotmail for policy reasons.
Reasons
for rejection may be related to content with spam-like
characteristics or
IP/domain reputation problems. If you are not an
email/network admin please
contact your E-mail/Internet Service Provider
for help. Email/network admins,
please visit x for
email delivery information and support (in reply to MAIL
FROM command)



Reporting-MTA: dns;
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: C9CD66C0F4
X-Postfix-Sender:
rfc822; XXXXXXXX
Arrival-Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:30:50 +0000 (UTC)



Final-Recipient: rfc822; XXXXX />Original-Recipient: rfc822;XXXXXX
Action: failed
Status:
5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; hotmailserver
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550
OU-001 Mail rejected by Windows Live Hotmail for
policy reasons. Reasons for
rejection may be related to content with
spam-like characteristics or
IP/domain reputation problems. If you are not
an email/network admin please
contact your E-mail/Internet Service Provider
for help. Email/network admins,
please visit x for
email delivery information and support




class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



Yep,
Windows Live can be a pain. Check:





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able