Skip to main content

Multiple SSL on NGINX with shared settings?

I have an NGINX development server. I have a large number of configuration directives which drive various features of the server.



I want to be able to access the server via SSL. The problem is that I may access the server from different domain names. For example, inside my LAN I might use 192.168.1.100, but on the Internet (via NAT forwarding) I'd use my home domain name, or in some specific instances the server's external IP address.




Since SSL depends on the hostname the client requested, I want to be able to generate and serve up multiple SSL certificates based on how the server is being accessed. For example, one certificate's CN would be "https://192.168.1.100" while another's would be "https://www.example.com" and yet another's might be "https://12.34.56.78".



I think it may be possible to accomplish this by duplicating server blocks like this:



server {
listen 443 ssl;
server_name 192.168.1.10;
ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/192.168.1.10.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/192.168.1.10.pem;

location / {
root /var/www/root;
index index.html index.htm;
}
}
server {
listen 443 ssl;
server_name www.example.com;
ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/www.example.com.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/www.example.com.pem;

location / {
root /var/www/root;
index index.html index.htm;
}
}
...


The problem is that I have several (i.e. more than 10) location blocks inside my server configuration because I am testing multiple configurations, environments and web applications on the same server. Most of these locations include either a FastCGI pass through and/or an alias or rewrite directive.




Duplicating all of the location blocks is not only tedious but could lead to inconsistencies if I forget to update every single one.



In addition, I have also planned to possibly use this environment in the future in such a way that would actually use subdomains, each with different location blocks. So now we end up with something like this:




  • www.example.com uses location parameter set 1

  • 12.34.56.78 uses location parameter set 1

  • test.example.com uses location parameter set 2

  • 192.168.1.100 uses location parameter set 2




As long as I don't use SSL, this isn't an issue since the server will always serve out of the "default" server block. But SSL seems to require a separate server block for each domain name in order to serve the unique certificates...



Ideally, what I'd like is some kind of "named grouping/include" where I could write all the location blocks in a separate section and then include them within the server blocks. My "ideal" solution if it existed:



config config1 {
location / {
root /var/www/root;
index index.html index.htm;
}

location /testapp1 {
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_split_path_info ^(/testapp1)(.*)$;
fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
fastcgi_pass unix:/run/testapp1.sock;
}
}
config config2 {
location / {
root /var/www/root2;

index index.html index.htm;
}
location /testapp2 {
include fastcgi_params;
fastcgi_split_path_info ^(/testapp2)(.*)$;
fastcgi_param PATH_INFO $fastcgi_path_info;
fastcgi_pass unix:/run/testapp2.sock;
}
}


server {
listen 443 ssl;
server_name 192.168.1.100;
ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/192.168.1.10.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/192.168.1.10.pem;
include config config1;
}
server {
listen 443 ssl;
server_name www.example.com;

ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/www.example.com.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/www.example.com.pem;
include config config1;
}
server {
listen 443 ssl;
server_name test.example.com;
ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/test.example.com.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/test.example.com.pem;
include config config2;

}
...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able