Skip to main content

centos - Proxy (or redirect?) request per location

itemprop="text">

Something like this works globally
with
mod_proxy:




ProxyPass
/api/* http://localhost:8081/api
ProxyPassReverse /api/*
http://localhost:8081/api


so
all my client requests for /api are directed to
http://localhost:8081/api



What
if I got two locations like localhost/site1/ &
localhost/site2/
and I needed different redirection
per site?all these apps request /api
asynchronously




so visiting site1,

an xhr call is made requesting /api, I would like href="http://localhost:8081/api" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://localhost:8081/api
to respond



for /site2 an xhr call is made requesting /api,
I would like http://localhost:9091/api to
respond



Can this be done with an .htaccess in
each of those folders, or by global redirection?Do I need mod_rewrite with http Referrer
rule or mod_proxy for this
one?



thanks



Answer




Having different, location based proxy settings is
perfectly possible.




First, the href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypass" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">ProxyPass is not a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">redirection i.e. location doesn't change. It is a href="https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/howto/reverse_proxy.html" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">reverse proxy that obtains the content from external
source.




As httpd
receives a request from a client, the request itself is
proxied to one of
these backend servers, which then handles the
request, generates the content
and then sends this content back to
httpd, which then generates the actual
HTTP response back to the

client.





Then,
you can't use ProxyPass in .htaccess
context, but it's possible to use it in
context. Let's assume that you want example.com/site1/api to be
proxied to localhost:8081/api and
/site2/api to
localhost:8082/api:



            *:80>
ServerName example.com

"/site1/api/">
ProxyPass "http://localhost:8081/api/"

ProxyPassReverse "http://localhost:8081/api/"




"/site2/api/">
ProxyPass "http://localhost:8082/api/"

ProxyPassReverse "http://localhost:8082/api/"





Your
alternative syntax is also possible directly in the
context, but a) it can carry a
performance penalty when present in very large numbers
and b) something must
be left to homework.




/>

Further discussion based on additional
details from comments & edit on the
question.



While possible,
I can't recommend the following as a viable solution, as
having always a working HTTP referer on every request isn't guaranteed. For example, if
any API request has reference to another /api URL, the referer
might be /api or empty instead of
/siteN. Having different URLs for API calls from different
sites, like in my first solution, is much more manageable and
reliable.



If you need to share the common URL
/api between XMLHttpRequests (XHR)
from /site1 and /site2 and proxy them
to different back-ends based on referer (if your API requests sends referer), it might
be possible to rel="nofollow noreferrer">Use mod_rewrite for Proxying distinguish the
request from different sites with



 RewriteEngine
on


RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}
^https://example\.com\/site1/
RewriteRule ^api/(.*)$
"http://localhost:8081/api/$1" [P]

RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}
^https://example\.com\/site2/
RewriteRule ^api/(.*)$
"http://localhost:8082/api/$1" [P]


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able