Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Apache2 ssl + virtualhosts of the same domain

itemprop="text">

My webserver hosts several subdomains
(vhosts) of a website, say sub1.example.com and sub2.example.com. The only difference
between these vhosts is the documentroot. Everything else is shared across
vhosts.



Now I would like to do the same for
HTTPS, but of course ssl + virtualhost is tricky. The good thing is that my SSL
certificate is valid for my complete domain. Hence I don't need to specify per-vhosts
certificate. The only thing that I want to specify per vhost is the document root.



The href="http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_faq.html#vhosts2" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">FAQ
says:






Name-Based Virtual Hosting is a very popular method of identifying

different virtual hosts. It allows you to use the same IP address and
the
same port number for many different sites. When people move on to
SSL, it
seems natural to assume that the same method can be used to
have lots of
different SSL virtual hosts on the same server.




It is possible, but only if using a 2.2.12 or later web server,
built
with 0.9.8j or later OpenSSL. This is because it requires a
feature
that only the most recent revisions of the SSL specification
added,

called Server Name Indication
(SNI).




I am using
Ubuntu 11.10 which ships with Apache 2.2.20 and openssl 1.0.0e so I think I should be
good. However, I can't get it to work. I already have default and default-ssl sites
enabled. If I add a virtualhost like I would do for
HTTP:



            *:443>
ServerName sub1.example.com
DocumentRoot
/var/www/sub1




And
then try to restart Apache, I
get:




[Thu Mar 01
23:55:15 2012] [warn] default VirtualHost overlap on

port 443, the first has precedence Action 'start'
failed.



class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



What you
probably need is three
things:





  1. A
    NameVirtualHost *:80 directive. If you want to follow the
    Ubuntu conventions, put this in
    ports.conf.

  2. Fix the host
    specification on the default SSL vhost. It's set to _default_:443> in the default config; it needs to match the listener
    specification of your other vhost and your NameVirtualHost
    directive.

  3. You also need to specify the SSL-related
    settings in your new vhost. SSLEngine On and your certificate
    settings are
    needed.



..and if this
isn't the case, then please provide your existing config and the output of
apache2ctl -S.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able