Skip to main content

storage - NHS WD Drive into HS HP DL180 G6 (SATA) Slot

itemprop="text">

I'm trying to find out if Non Hot Swap
drives can be plugged into Hot Swap slots on a HP DL180 G6 server. I've been searching
around but haven't found the answer I am looking for. I also can't find the manual for
the server before we buy one.



Reason for this is
because HP drives cost like they have gold in them. I can get 2TB WD black's for like
$150 locally. The question is, will 2TB WD black's
work?



Yes we are saving money and no this will
not host mission critical data. It will only store videos.



Answer





For modern drives (SAS / SATA),
HP's "Hot swap" and "Non-hot swap" drive designations refer to the type of drive caddy
(** and controller) used, rather than anything particular about the drive. All SATA and
SAS drives are electrically hotswappable. (For SCSI and IDE disks, there was a real
difference - only SCA SCSI disks were hotswappable, nothing else
was)



So, if you have the correct disk caddies
already, you can physically and electrically put in third-party drives just
fine.



Whether the controller in your DL180 G6
will support a 2TB drive or not is another question, and one I don't know the answer to.
It may require specific firmware on the drives, for example. Sorry I can't help you
there.



As a side point, I've seen a lot of
issues with non-RE ("RAID Edition") class WD disks when used in hardware RAID
controllers. The RE disks have a feature called Time-Limited Error Recovery (TLER)
( rel="nofollow noreferrer">datasheet for RE4 disk), which basically means
the drive gives up a lot earlier when it encounters some errors. Without this reduced
error timeout, the disk stalls for longer, which results in the array controller
thinking the disk is having a problem and subsequently removing it from the array. Your
mileage may vary on this point - but if you find that the disks are being ejected from
their RAID set without any obvious reason, you might be seeing this
issue.



Updated to add: I think I still wasn't
clear in my comment. There is no physical or electrical reason why you can't use any
non-HP SAS or SATA disks in this system, because all SAS and SATA disks are hot-swap
anyway.




Even the HP "non-hot swap"
disks are technically hot-swappable, however the disk controller or back-plane in the HP
systems with NHS disks may not support hot-swapping.



So, barring an unforeseen controller/firmware
limitation, you should be fine.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able