Skip to main content

linux - Recovering from bad chown command

itemprop="text">

I was going to change the ownership of
a directory to apache:apache, but I ended up
running:



chown -R apache:apache
/


Bad! Very bad! I
knew what was going on when it started
saying:






chown: changing ownership of `/proc/2694/fd/48': Permission
denied




That's when
I stopped everything (Ctrl+C).



/>

The current system I have is a server running
virtualbox running CentOS 5. This problem happened inside the
VM.



Currently, everything seems to be working,
but I have not restarted the system yet, and to be honest, I'm afraid that if I did
something will break.




I do not know
chown's order, should I be concerned and assume something will
break after a reboot? Is there a way to recover form this problem without having to rely
on backups? I do have a daily one, but I thought there may be a simpler way
out.



Answer




It would be good to have an old backup, but
IMHO it would suffice to be able to extract the ownership
data.



I would it do this
way:




  • First, make
    a backup of the current state.


  • Then,
    restore the original properties according to the RPMDB. This will probably repair a lot
    of your files



  • To identify
    and repair the remaining ones, find all files which are still subject to this problem.
    These are the files which belong to apache:apache and are in
    the "search order" before /proc . Maybe you
    do



    ls -U
    /


    first and get the
    list of root level entries before /proc (I suppose this is
    where you canceled the process).



    Then do a



    find /foo /bar /baz -user apache
    -group
    apache



    replacing
    foo, bar, baz
    with the entries identified before. Redirect find's output to a
    file.


  • Extract all the ownership data
    of the given files from the backup and apply them to the
    files.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able