Skip to main content

iptables - Server behind DMZ firewall won't respond

I have a DMZ server set up to forward specific ports to a
couple of machines. The intended behavior is for me to send a request to the DMZ on a
specific port, and have the machine that's inaccessible publicly respond with data. In
this example, I'm forwarding port 10001 to the non-pub server on port
80.



I can see that the forward is working,
because I can see the packets come in via tcpdump on the server. For whatever reason,
the packets it responds with aren't making it back to my terminal (I'm
curling).




iptables-save:



#
            Generated by iptables-save v1.4.10 on Fri Dec 23 17:36:10
            2011
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [5609:332934]
:INPUT ACCEPT
            [5609:332934]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [5231:376507]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT
            [5248:377595]
-A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 10001 -j DNAT
            --to-destination 192.168.1.11:80
COMMIT

# Completed on
            Fri Dec 23 17:36:10 2011
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.10 on Fri Dec 23
            17:36:10 2011
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT
            [119300:24294441]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [183:10688]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT
            [118926:28442933]
-A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport
            10001 -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
# Completed on Fri Dec 23 17:36:10
            2011



Note:
I took my ip out and replaced it with 10.10.10.10
Legend:




  • 192.168.1.3 =
    DMZ

  • 192.168.1.11 = Non-public
    server

  • 10.10.10.10 = me from a remote
    network.




tcpdump
from the DMZ:



17:44:45.039273 IP
            10.10.10.10.64090 > 192.168.1.3.10001: Flags [S], seq 2710805211, win 65535, options
            [mss 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 1211306586 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length
            0
17:44:45.039365 IP 10.10.10.10.64090 > 192.168.1.11.www: Flags [S], seq
            2710805211, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 1211306586 ecr
            0,sackOK,eol], length
            0


Based on the above,
the forwarding appears to be working.



tcpdump
from the non-public
server:




17:51:14.260134
            IP 10.10.10.10.64110 > 192.168.1.11.www: Flags [S], seq 722619659, win 65535, options
            [mss 1460,nop,wscale 3,nop,nop,TS val 1211694763 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length
            0
17:51:14.260378 IP 192.168.1.11.www > 10.10.10.10.64110: Flags [S.], seq
            3171485713, ack 722619660, win 14480, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 4294937443 ecr
            1211694763,nop,wscale 3], length 0
17:51:14.260470 IP 10.10.10.10.64111 >
            192.168.1.11.www: Flags [S], seq 483447265, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale
            3,nop,nop,TS val 1211694763 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length
            0


My curl from a
remote network (obfuscated IP):



$
            curl -vv remote-unit:10001
* About to connect() to remote-unit port 10001
            (#0)
* Trying 99.99.99.99... Operation timed out

*
            couldn't connect to host
* Closing connection #0
curl: (7) couldn't
            connect to host

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...
Post a Comment
Read more