Skip to main content

partition - Native ZFS Configuration on Ubuntu



I'm experimenting with Native-ZFS on Ubuntu right now. Here are the drives installed on the system:





  • 2 x 2TB

  • 3 x 1TB

  • a 200GB operating system disk



I've got the OS installed and the stable ZFS RC for 12.04 installed via the PPA.



In terms of ZFS configuration, I'd like to get the maximum theoretical capacity with 1 drive failure protection (so 5TB). I was planning on this configuration:





  • 1 zpool:


    • 1 4TB RAIDZ vdev:


      • 3 x 1TB drives

      • 2 x 1TB partitions, one from each of the 2TB drives



    • 1 1TB Mirrored vdev:


      • 2 x 1TB partitions, one from each of the 2TB drives





First off, does this configuration make sense? Is there a better way to achieve 5TB (such as a 7 x 1TB RAIDZ2)? I'm not terribly concerned with performance (although I am somewhat concerned with upgradeability).




Secondly, can anybody point me to a guide (or show me) the ZFS incantations to create such a (mildly complicated) pool? All of the guides I've found create a 1-1 zpool-vdev and use the entire raw disk, not partitions. Most of the documentation I've found for ZFS regarding partitions is BSD or Solaris dependent, and I'm not sure how much of it applies to Linux.



Thanks!


Answer



the only difference between using the whole disk to create a pool and part of a disk is that you have to partition the disk first. so on your 2 TB drives, create 2 partitions, each 1 TB, using whatever partition tool you choose. (that would not be a zfs utility, but instead something like fdisk.)



then when you issue your zpool command, pass the partition instead of the drive:



zpool create tank1 raidz /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1



and the same for the 1 TB mirror:



zpool create tank2 mirror /dev/sde2 /dev/sdf2

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...