Skip to main content

linux - How to quickly find out if a *nix server is running OK?

itemprop="text">

Often when I find myself in front of a
unix/linux (or any other *nix variant) console and have to quickly diagnose the server's
condition, I just can't remember everything that should be
checked.



I'll try a vmstat, some ps/top
manoeuvres, read procinfo and some log files (boot & sys), but what I'd really like
is a quick way to view Cpu, Hard disk and Physical Memory
condition.



I seem to know a lot of it already is
present in vmstat, but somehow I miss the ease of server 2008 where you can find a nice
resource monitor while even the task manager itself can provide a quick peek on the
system condition (and not even talking about server 2008's monitoring graph
tools).



Any suggestion, or am I just being lame
because vmstat really is the grail ?




/>

Edit:
Well thanks for the feedback,
everyone. I should add that I'm not really talking about constant monitoring (where
nagios is a very good proposition), but about an occasional walk to a server - not
necessarily mine - to do a quick system condition lookup (sometimes I just happen to be
somewhere and Bang, Hey, can you come over to check this one
?)



The stick with some utility-scripts is indeed
nice, already have one with sysinternals apps for windows machines. Htop is cool also,
although I don't think being able to install it wherever I happen to
be.



Answer




top is a good
tool (if its installed), but the other one I like for a real quick look to see if
anything is wrong is dmesg. That should let you know if the
server's experiencing something incredibly major (disconnected nics, disk faults, memory
faults etc).


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able