Skip to main content

windows - How to make IIS 7/8 rewrite and redirect URL with DB Provider

Please, have patience if this question is long but I have never worked on this complex program which was developed by colleague of mine before I was recruited.



We have this web application running on .NET Framework v2.0 CLR. Anyway, this program is not natively written in C# but we must use a framework called Instant Developer which converts the code in a .NET application. The application runs in a Windows Server 2012 R2 under IIS 8 and with SQL Server 2014 R2.




So, inside this application there is a very big directory called "photos" which contains a photo of each work a user completes. When the program was developed, our customer told us that very few photos were compulsory so my
colleague thought that a unique directory was enough. But in this years the requirements have changed. Therefore, now a photo must be taken for each work and so that directory today contains more than 5 millions of files. Consequently, it is not openable anymore by Windows Explorer, if I try the server blocks. Last month, our server was attacked by a crypto locker and my bosses decided to pay in order to get a decrypter otherwise our custmomer will ask us to pay a fine for each file which was lost. As soon as we have finished to recover our files, my boss asked to divide this huge directory into sub directories like /year/month/day. This can be easily done by a python script but the problem is that our customer registered in SAP a link to see that photo of this form



https://www.ourserver.it/applicationName/photo/file.jpg


and they told us they will refuse to change it.
So, I would like to change the path of the photo in the database and, somehow, give instructions to IIS 8 in order that when it receives a URL like the previous, it should query the datatabase, discover the new path and then redirect the client to a new URL like:



https://www.ourserver.it/applicationName/photo/year/month/day/file.jpg



This event is not catchable by the framework we use, that's why I need to program IIS in this way.



So, I strictly followed this guide and I installed URL Rewrite extensibility code samples.



In IIS I've added a re-write URL provider called DB to my web application (in its site inside IIS) which should call a stored procedure on a SQL Server Database.
The stored procedure works fine: given an old URL it queries a table on a specific new databse (as the guide suggested) and returns the new one. Running:



exec dbo.GetRewrittenUrl @input='http://localhost/OmniService/foto/18443151-810079.jpg'



I get this result: http://localhost/OmniService/foto/2017/02/02/18443151-810079.jpg



Here's what I have on web.config file:



























So, according to that table if I perform




http://localhost/OmniService/foto/18443151-810079.jpg


I expect to be returned



http://localhost/OmniService/foto/2017/02/02/18443151-810079.jpg


This does not happen and I get a 404 HTTP Error and there's no new URL. Or simetimes I get a 500 Internal Server Error.
The regular expression is correct and it is recognised because I tested it with IIS. So, I supposed there a sort of problem with the comunication between IIS and the DBMS. I've tried to write some python script to test the given string connection is correct and so it seems. But there are too many possibilities to write a string connection. Which is the correct?

How can I detect the error? What the hell am I missing? I've been working on this for more than 10 hours and I don't know where to look for the mistake.
Could you please help?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able