Skip to main content

networking - Need help choosing a router and/or wireless AP for a 15-40 person office?

I've been tasked with improving the wireless network at my
office / co-working space. I'm not particularly experienced with business network
infrastructure, but I'm more experienced than probably all of the other people here and
have volunteered to figure it
out.




Our main issue is that our wifi
network is lacking. Typically we have around 30 wifi devices in the office at a time,
half of which are phones and half of which are laptops, but sometimes it can go as high
as 60 - 80 devices. For example, we were a jam site for the last global game jam and had
40 laptops vying for wifi bandwidth, and some untold number of mobile
devices.



Most of these laptops are running
software like Dropbox or Google Drive, which sucks up a lot of bandwidth. Occasionally
people may be streaming video and audio. We also regularly do video conference calls
over wifi, and sometimes they don't perform well, which is the biggest thorn in people's
sides.



We have the budget to get ourselves
decent networking hardware, but I'm not sure what will fulfill our needs given the
above. I'm planning on having our modem, router, switches, and wireless AP be separate
devices since that generally seems to be recommend
here.



Past that, I'm not sure how to move
forward! In particular, I'm not sure how to choose a router, wireless AP / router, or
both that will work for us. Other questions I'm looking for help on include but are not
limited
to:





  • Will
    QoS help us prioritize important traffic like video calls and web traffic over bandwidth
    suckers like Dropbox or BitTorrent? If so, should QoS happen at the router, the wireless
    AP, or both?


  • Do we actually want the
    wireless AP to be a separate piece of hardware from the
    router?


  • Could we get a consumer level
    wifi router and put it in bridge mode? Or is it better to get a business level access
    point?


  • Should we just hire someone
    else to handle
    this?




Any help
will be greatly appreciated!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able