Skip to main content

centos6 - iptables outgoing default policy is accept, but some ports appear blocked

itemprop="text">

I'm new to servers and iptables. I
have a web app (happens to be bugzilla) running on my Centos 6.7 apache/httpd server,
and it attempts to connect out to the web (updates.bugzilla.org) via port 80. It also
attempts to connect out (to smtp.gmail.com) using port 465. However, it cannot. This is
in spite of having a default output policy of ACCEPT and having opened the relevant
ports for input.



I'm not sure where to go from
here. Where should I look to begin troubleshooting this? What are the likely culprits?




Some
output:




$ service
iptables status



Table:
filter



Chain INPUT (policy
ACCEPT)




num target prot opt source
destination



1 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0
0.0.0.0/0



2 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
state RELATED,ESTABLISHED



3 ACCEPT tcp --
0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:22



4 ACCEPT tcp
-- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:80





5 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:443




6 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:25



7 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp
dpt:587



Chain FORWARD (policy
DROP)
num target prot opt source destination




Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)

num target prot
opt source destination




AND:





iptables -L -v
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 881 packets, 106K
bytes)



pkts bytes target prot opt in out
source destination




0 0 ACCEPT all
-- lo any anywhere anywhere



436 183K ACCEPT
all -- any any anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED




0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ssh



1 60 ACCEPT tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere
tcp dpt:http



0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- any any
anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:https




0
0 ACCEPT tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:smtp




0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:submission



Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0
bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination



Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 348 packets,
56741 bytes)




pkts bytes target prot
opt in out source destination




I'm hopeful that
it is not a bugzilla or centos-specific thing, as I have accomplished a successful
bugzilla install on ubuntu desktop, although that was while using ubuntu's ufw (I think
I also tried it with iptables, but would have to try again to
verify).





For those web
searching and seeing this at a later date, it turns out this was a SELinux issue! Needed
to enable the boolean 'httpd_can_network_connect' (for others, use 'getsebool -a').


style="font-weight: bold;">

Answer




Try
this:




service iptables
            save
service iptables stop
chkconfig iptables
            off


Boom, no firewall.
Test again.



Try using telnet to test that port:




telnet
            updates.bugzilla.org
            80


Once connected with
telnet, type "get" and see if there's a
response.



Example:

#
            telnet updates.bugzilla.org 80
Trying 63.245.223.29... 
Connected to
            updates.bugzilla.org.

Escape character is
            '^]'
get

400 Bad<br />            Request
            bgcolor="white">
400 Bad
            Request

            />
nginx/1.0.15



Connection
            closed by foreign
            host.



Didn't
work?



Try tcptraceroute to see where it gets
blocked:



tcptraceroute
            updates.bugzilla.org
            80


Could there be
something else blocking ports? A firewall, router, ISP?




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...
Post a Comment
Read more