Skip to main content

smtp - DKIM for email through Google Apps domain with external outbound relay

itemprop="text">

I'd like to enable the new href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">Domain Keys DKIM email authentication feature for a href="http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?answer=180504" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">domain hosted in Google
Apps.



Some of my users use an external
SMTP gateway (such that when they send email, it doesn't go through smtp.gmail.com).




I have an href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">SPF record configured for the domain, and this allows the
external SMTP gateways as valid SMTP hosts. (I realise SPF is different to
DKIM)



Will enabling DKIM adversely affect the
external gateway email? eg. Are the externally sent emails at risk of being marked as
spam because they would not have the DKIM signature, or will DKIM only positively
benefit emails sent through Google's SMTP server?



Answer




Your users can use an external SMTP server. But of course, their emails will
have a worse reputation, compared to those directly sent from Google's server, and for
two reasons :




  • The first
    one is that they won't be signed by DKIM (luckily the server is declared in the SPF
    record)

  • You'll send mails from a server that is not
    declared as a MX for the
    domain




We're
just talking here about email reputation (ie the spam score). But don't worry it will
work : You may just sometimes have mails seen as spam, in general with big companies
with high spam protections (AOL, Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, ...).



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...