Skip to main content

amazon ec2 - Disk size and space detection

i'm running a server with debian stable
:




Linux myhostname
2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 8 00:01:30 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux



It is running a nginx,
mail server,ftp server and a mysql
database.



This morning postfix complained it''s
running out of space, so I double checked the free storage and it is as
such



root@myhostname:# cat
/etc/fstab
/dev/xvda1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
/dev/xvda2 /mnt ext3
defaults 0 0

/dev/xvda3 swap swap defaults 0 0
none /proc
proc defaults 0 0
none /sys sysfs defaults 0
0


root@myhostname:# cat /etc/mtab
/dev/xvda1 /
ext3 rw 0 0
tmpfs /lib/init/rw tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 0 0
proc
/proc proc rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev
0 0

udev /dev tmpfs rw,mode=0755 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs
rw,nosuid,nodev 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620 0
0
/dev/xvdf /mnt ext4 rw 0
0


So "/dev/xvdf" is a
big hdd (500GB) mounted on /mnt and it is where all the stuff related to the webservice
is stored, "/dev/xvda1" instead is mounted in the root filesystem and it is an amazon
aws standard image ami, 8GB, both of them should have enough free space
but:



root@myhostname:# df
-h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on

/dev/xvda1
1008M 1008M 0 100% /
tmpfs 306M 0 306M 0% /lib/init/rw
udev 286M 32K
286M 1% /dev
tmpfs 306M 0 306M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/xvdf 493G 1.1G 467G
1% /mnt

root@myhostname:# fdisk -l /dev/xvda1
Disk
/dev/xvda1: 8589 MB, 8589934592
bytes



I'm
pretty sure that /dev/xvda is 8GB capacity but for some reason the system sees only 1GB
and it is now entirely filled, any ideas why?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able