Skip to main content

adaptec - Raid 10, Logical device are missing

I have a problem with a RAID 10, I have 4 disks on raid. A
disc has just been changed (0,3). But I can not rebuild the array. Logical device are
setted as "Missing".



All commands return to me
the following
error





/usr/StorMan#
            /usr/StorMan/arcconf setstate 1 device 0 3 rdyControllers found: 1
The device
            specified does not exist.

Command
            aborted.



/usr/StorMan#
            /usr/StorMan/arcconf getconfig 1 
Controllers found:
            1

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Controller
            information
----------------------------------------------------------------------

            Controller Status : Optimal
 Channel description : SAS/SATA

            Controller Model : Adaptec 2405
 Controller Serial Number :
            2D2711FE327
 Physical Slot : 16
 Temperature : 68 C/ 154 F
            (Normal)
 Installed memory : 128 MB

 Copyback :
            Disabled
 Background consistency check : Disabled
 Automatic
            Failover : Enabled
 Global task priority : High
 Performance Mode :
            Default/Dynamic
 Stayawake period : Disabled
 Spinup limit internal
            drives : 0
 Spinup limit external drives : 0
 Defunct disk drive
            count : 0
 Logical devices/Failed/Degraded : 1/0/1

 SSDs
            assigned to MaxIQ Cache pool : 0
 Maximum SSDs allowed in MaxIQ Cache pool :
            8
 MaxIQ Read Cache Pool Size : 0.000 GB
 MaxIQ cache fetch rate :
            0
 MaxIQ Cache Read, Write Balance Factor : 3,1
 NCQ status :
            Enabled
 Statistics data collection mode : Enabled

            --------------------------------------------------------
 Controller Version
            Information

            --------------------------------------------------------

 BIOS :
            5.2-0 (18937)
 Firmware : 5.2-0 (18937)
 Driver : 1.1-7
            (28000)
 Boot Flash : 5.2-0
            (18937)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Logical
            device
            information
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Logical
            device number 0
 Logical device name : 

 RAID level :
            10
 Status of logical device : Degraded
 Size : 3809270
            MB
 Stripe-unit size : 256 KB
 Read-cache mode : Enabled

            MaxIQ preferred cache setting : Enabled
 MaxIQ cache setting :
            Disabled
 Write-cache mode : Enabled (write-back)
 Write-cache
            setting : Enabled (write-back)
 Partitioned : Yes


            Protected by Hot-Spare : No
 Bootable : Yes
 Failed stripes :
            Yes
 Power settings : Disabled

            --------------------------------------------------------
 Logical device
            segment information

            --------------------------------------------------------
 Group 0, Segment 0 :
            Present (0,1) W1F20KQ9
 Group 0, Segment 1 : Present (0,0) Z34063KS

            Group 1, Segment 0 : Present (0,2) W1E2PW1C

 Group 1,
            Segment 1 :
            Missing


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Physical
            Device
            information
----------------------------------------------------------------------

            Device #0
 Device is a Hard drive
 State : Online

            Supported : Yes

 Transfer Speed : SATA 3.0 Gb/s
 Reported
            Channel,Device(T:L) : 0,0(0:0)
 Reported Location : Connector 0, Device
            0
 Vendor : 
 Model : ST2000DM001-1CH1
 Firmware :
            CC24
 Serial number : Z34063KS
 Size : 1907729 MB
 Write
            Cache : Enabled (write-back)
 FRU : None

 S.M.A.R.T. :
            No
 S.M.A.R.T. warnings : 0
 Power State : Full rpm

            Supported Power States : Full rpm,Powered off,Reduced rpm
 SSD : No

            MaxIQ Cache Capable : No
 MaxIQ Cache Assigned : No
 NCQ status :
            Enabled
 Device #1
 Device is a Hard drive


            State : Online
 Supported : Yes
 Transfer Speed : SATA 3.0
            Gb/s
 Reported Channel,Device(T:L) : 0,1(1:0)
 Reported Location :
            Connector 0, Device 1
 Vendor : 
 Model :
            ST2000DM001-1CH1
 Firmware : CC24
 Serial number :
            W1F20KQ9
 Size : 1907729 MB

 Write Cache : Enabled
            (write-back)
 FRU : None
 S.M.A.R.T. : No
 S.M.A.R.T.
            warnings : 0
 Power State : Full rpm
 Supported Power States : Full
            rpm,Powered off,Reduced rpm
 SSD : No
 MaxIQ Cache Capable :
            No
 MaxIQ Cache Assigned : No
 NCQ status :
            Enabled

 Device #2
 Device is a Hard drive

            State : Online
 Supported : Yes
 Transfer Speed : SATA 3.0
            Gb/s
 Reported Channel,Device(T:L) : 0,2(2:0)
 Reported Location :
            Connector 0, Device 2
 Vendor : 
 Model :
            ST2000DM001-1CH1
 Firmware : CC24

 Serial number :
            W1E2PW1C
 Size : 1907729 MB
 Write Cache : Enabled
            (write-back)
 FRU : None
 S.M.A.R.T. : No
 S.M.A.R.T.
            warnings : 0
 Power State : Full rpm
 Supported Power States : Full
            rpm,Powered off,Reduced rpm
 SSD : No
 MaxIQ Cache Capable :
            No

 MaxIQ Cache Assigned : No
 NCQ status :
            Enabled


How can I start the
rebuilding of the array?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more