Skip to main content

security - Scanning Vendors (non-PCI related) - Hype or Not?

itemprop="text">

For months now, when building websites
for clients, I've come across virtually trillions of "Site Security Scanners" supposedly
endorsed/approved by various shared web hosts who claim to run XSS, SQL injections, spam
measures, and other checks, all for around $300 upwards if you want the plans that do
more than one scan a year.



I'm not talking about
PCI compliance scans like those offered by Comodo, McAfee, Symantec and the like, which
normally cost thousands per year, but rather these vendors seem to be playing off the
fear of less technical business owners by offering an affordable alternative to the PCI
fims.



Although I could mention a few companies,
I know of too many to list, so my main question is: Are these "affordable" scans a good
alternative to a PCI scanner if you don't do eCommerce. What about if you're on a
shared/managed plan -- shouldn't the host handle
this?




As for sites with eCommerce,
since some merchants processors mandate their own PCI vendors, or even cover the cost of
PCI scans, is it necessary to have an additional scan
happening?



Thank you very much to everyone for
any insights as this has been on my mind for ages.



Answer




Sturgeon's Law of IT ("90% of everything is snakeoil") applies to this as much
as it does to any other aspect of IT. We all know that PCI is just a flaming
hoop/bag-of-dog-poo you need to jump through to process credit cards (a "cost of doing
business", like paying off your local neighbourhood mobster for "protection"), and not
an actual security audit; these automated scans are like walking up to someone random on
the street and offering them $100 to not burn down your
store.



The only time I might consider one of
these places is as an insurance policy against really incompetent developers (that I had
no ability to just get rid of). Make it a mandatory part of the acceptance testing that
if their code failed one of these scans, they get paid nothing (and, preferably, they
get beaten with a stick and set on fire). I can't imagine any sort of automated scan
finding issues with the code of a competent web developer in 2011 -- it's not as though
any of the issues aren't well-known, and hiring competent people is the most important
aspect of running any business.



That being said,
the best way to make money is to find suckers, and I'll bet these companies are making
plenty of money. Just make sure you're not one of the suckers. To really gauge the
effectiveness of any of these companies, just ask them what sort of guarantees they make
about their product -- if they're not willing to provide some sort of written guarantee
that they've found all the security problems (and that they're willing to be liable if
you get hacked in the future), then not only are they selling snake-oil, they
know they're selling snake-oil.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

linux - How can I get my mediawiki to stop thinking I have cookies disabled?

I've searched half a day for how to resolve this issue, and can't figure it out. Shortly after I made my wiki a simple private wiki according to the instructions at Mediawiki's website, it started giving me this weird login error message: Wiki uses cookies to log in users. You have cookies disabled. Please enable them and try again. If I remove those private wiki settings, the error disappears, even if I try logging in. But I need it to be a private wiki for only my team. So what do I do? Here's what I've done so far. Just to be safe, after ever change, I try rebooting Apache using: sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart In my php.ini file, I have the following set: session.save_path = "/var/lib/php5" session.cookie_secure = secure session.cookie_path = /tmp session.cookie_domain = my server's internal URL (should I even set this? this field was blank before, but not commented out) session.referer_check = Off I ran the following to ensure that the fold...