Skip to main content

security - Scanning Vendors (non-PCI related) - Hype or Not?



For months now, when building websites for clients, I've come across virtually trillions of "Site Security Scanners" supposedly endorsed/approved by various shared web hosts who claim to run XSS, SQL injections, spam measures, and other checks, all for around $300 upwards if you want the plans that do more than one scan a year.



I'm not talking about PCI compliance scans like those offered by Comodo, McAfee, Symantec and the like, which normally cost thousands per year, but rather these vendors seem to be playing off the fear of less technical business owners by offering an affordable alternative to the PCI fims.



Although I could mention a few companies, I know of too many to list, so my main question is: Are these "affordable" scans a good alternative to a PCI scanner if you don't do eCommerce. What about if you're on a shared/managed plan -- shouldn't the host handle this?




As for sites with eCommerce, since some merchants processors mandate their own PCI vendors, or even cover the cost of PCI scans, is it necessary to have an additional scan happening?



Thank you very much to everyone for any insights as this has been on my mind for ages.


Answer



Sturgeon's Law of IT ("90% of everything is snakeoil") applies to this as much as it does to any other aspect of IT. We all know that PCI is just a flaming hoop/bag-of-dog-poo you need to jump through to process credit cards (a "cost of doing business", like paying off your local neighbourhood mobster for "protection"), and not an actual security audit; these automated scans are like walking up to someone random on the street and offering them $100 to not burn down your store.



The only time I might consider one of these places is as an insurance policy against really incompetent developers (that I had no ability to just get rid of). Make it a mandatory part of the acceptance testing that if their code failed one of these scans, they get paid nothing (and, preferably, they get beaten with a stick and set on fire). I can't imagine any sort of automated scan finding issues with the code of a competent web developer in 2011 -- it's not as though any of the issues aren't well-known, and hiring competent people is the most important aspect of running any business.



That being said, the best way to make money is to find suckers, and I'll bet these companies are making plenty of money. Just make sure you're not one of the suckers. To really gauge the effectiveness of any of these companies, just ask them what sort of guarantees they make about their product -- if they're not willing to provide some sort of written guarantee that they've found all the security problems (and that they're willing to be liable if you get hacked in the future), then not only are they selling snake-oil, they know they're selling snake-oil.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...