Skip to main content

ping - Junior admin - how to discover/map the network to increase understanding?

itemprop="text">

I am a junior admin and have been
tasked with gaining an understanding of the network. I know and use some of the servers
on the network, so am able to tracert/ping them to see the names/addresses of equipment
there are along the way, and gradually build a map, but how do I put the feelers out to
find out what's out there if I don't know the names of server etc?



Answer




Any time I want to map an unfamiliar network, I start with what the routing
protocols can tell me. And usually the routing protocols can tell me pretty much
everything. After all, the routing protocols have to know what the
network looks like—and it's almost never exactly the way it's documented (if it's
documented at all).



For an example of how this
would go and to make things easy, let's say we're running OSPF. The great thing about
OSPF (and link-state protocols generally) is that every router has already figured out
the topology of the network. You just have to ask one of
them:




> show ospf
database router

OSPF link state database, area 0.0.0.0

Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len
Router *192.168.0.1 192.168.0.1
0x80000005 1083 0x2 0x532c 96
Router 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.1 0x80000003 1124
0x2 0xe1df 84
Router 192.168.5.1 192.168.5.1 0x80000004 1129 0x2 0xcf2f
108
Router 192.168.8.1 192.168.8.1 0x80000006 1133 0x2 0x83ed
60
Router 192.168.12.1 192.168.12.1 0x80000007 126 0x2 0xc1c9
84

Router 192.168.16.1 192.168.16.1 0x80000005 1086 0x2 0x847e
72
Router 192.168.20.1 192.168.20.1 0x80000004 1094 0x2 0x54da
60
Router 192.168.24.1 192.168.24.1 0x80000005 1148 0x2 0xd42c
60
Router 192.168.28.1 192.168.28.1 0x80000006 293 0x2 0xcf9
60


There we go, we
have 9 routers in our OSPF area. Draw 9 boxes in visio and label them with those IPs.
Next, to figure out how they're connected, ask for more
detail:



> show ospf database
router detail


OSPF link state database, area
0.0.0.0
Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len
Router *192.168.0.1
192.168.0.1 0x80000005 1398 0x2 0x532c 96
bits 0x0, link count 5

id 192.168.5.1, data 10.0.0.1, Type PointToPoint (1)
TOS count 0, TOS 0
metric 1
id 10.0.0.0, data 255.255.255.0, Type Stub (3)
TOS count
0, TOS 0 metric 1
id 192.168.2.1, data 10.0.1.2, Type PointToPoint
(1)
TOS count 0, TOS 0 metric 1

id 10.0.1.0, data
255.255.255.0, Type Stub (3)
TOS count 0, TOS 0 metric 1
id
192.168.0.1, data 255.255.255.255, Type Stub (3)
TOS count 0, TOS 0 metric
0

Router 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.1 0x80000003 1439 0x2 0xe1df
84
...


So
here we're looking at the LSA for router 192.168.0.1. It has 5 links that OSPF knows
about. Two of the links id 192.168.5.1 and id
192.168.2.1
connect to other OSPF routers. Back to visio: draw a line
between the 192.168.0.1 box and the 192.168.5.1 box. Draw another line between the
192.168.0.1 box and the 192.168.2.1
box.




The other 3 links are stubs, so
OSPF will advertise the existence of those subnets, but there aren't any more OSPF
routers on those links. You can just draw 3 clouds in visio labeled with the subnet
information (plug in id and data for
the network and mask for each) and draw a line from each to the 192.168.0.1
router.



Keep doing that until you have a network
map.



Of course it's never quite that simple, but
no matter what, your routers have already figured out what your network looks like.
Transcribing your routers' databases onto a map is always an enlightening experience.
You'll learn lots about routing protocols AND your
network.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...