Skip to main content

linux - Bash: how to know if the last command's output ends with a newline or not?

itemprop="text">

Most of the time the output of a
command ends with the newline character. But sometimes it does not, so the next shell
prompt is printed in the same line together with the
output.




Example:





root@hostname [~] # echo -n hello
helloroot@hostname [~]
#




I've always
found that very annoying.
Now, I could just add a "\n" at the beginning of
the the PS1 variable, but most of the time that will print one extra line I dont
need.



Is it possible to know whether the last
command's output ended with a newline or
not?




/>

Solution: />(Thanks to
Dennis)



PS1='$(printf "%$((`tput
cols`-1))s\r")\u@\h [\w]\$ '


Answer




I've been experimenting with the following to emulate the feature from
zsh in
Bash:



$ unset PROMPT_SP; for ((i =
1; i <= $COLUMNS + 52; i++ )); do PROMPT_SP+=' '; done

$
PS1='\[\e[7m%\e[m\]${PROMPT_SP: -$COLUMNS+1}\015$
'


It issues a reverse
video percent sign, followed by a bunch of spaces to make it wrap to the next line, then
a carriage return, followed by a dollar sign and a space. You can add prompt escapes
after the "\015" to customize your prompt.



Using
this depends on how your terminal handles right margin line wrapping (automatic
margins). The length of PROMPT_SP is arbitrary, but should be at least 80 or whatever
your usual terminal width is. You may need to hard-code that value if $COLUMNS isn't set
yet by the time the for loop is run in
~/.bashrc. You may want shopt -s
checkwinsize
if it's not already set.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able