Skip to main content

filesystems - directory with 980MB meta data, millions of files, how to delete it? (ext3)








Hello,




So
I'm stuck with this
directory:



drwxrwxrwx 2 dan users
980M 2010-12-22 18:38 sessions2



The
directories contents is small - just millions of tiny little
files.



I want to wipe it from the filesystem but
have been unable to. My first try
was:



find sessions2 -type f
-delete




and



find
sessions2 -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rm
-f



but had to stop because both
caused escalating memory usage. At one point it was using 65% of the system's memory.



So I thought (no doubt incorrectly), that it
had to do with the fact that dir_index was enabled on the system. Perhaps find was
trying to read the entire index into memory?



So
I did this (foolishly): tune2fs -O^dir_index
/dev/xxx




Alright, so
that should do it. Ran the find command above again and... same
thing. Crazy memory usage.



I hurriedly ran
tune2fs -Odir_index /dev/xxx to reenable dir_index, and ran to
Server Fault!



2
questions:



1) How do I get rid of this directory
on my live system? I don't care how long it takes, as long as it uses little memory and
little CPU. By the way, using nice find ... I was able to
reduce CPU usage, so my problem right now is only memory
usage.



2) I disabled dir_index for about 20
minutes. No doubt new files were written to the filesystem in the meanwhile. I reenabled
dir_index. Does that mean the system will not find the files that were written before
dir_index was reenabled since their filenames will be missing from the old indexes? If
so and I know these new files aren't important, can I maintain the old indexes? If not,
how do I rebuild the indexes? Can it be done on a live
system?




Thanks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able