Skip to main content

domain name system - Is it possible to simplify my website DNS records?

itemprop="text">

Let's say I have mydomain.com and my
shared webhost server is 1.2.3.4. My domain registrar and webhosting company are 2
different entities.




Currently I have
my DNS records configured like this in my registrar DNS Management
section:



A
*.mydomain.com
1.2.3.4

A
mydomain.com
1.2.3.4


CNAME
ftp.mydomain.com
mydomain.com

CNAME
www.mydomain.com
mydomain.com

A
subdomain1.mydomain.com

1.2.3.4

A
subdomain2.mydomain.com
1.2.3.4

A
subdomainN.mydomain.com
1.2.3.4



I
have 2
questions/problems:



1)
Is there any way to simplify the sub-domain A records so that every time I need to add a
new sub-domain to my website I shouldn't have to create a new A record for it in the DNS
Management?



2) With
the current configuration when the user points to any sub-domain that don't exist (for
instance: idontexist.mydomain.com) a default page from cPanel is displayed. I suppose
this is the normal behavior? Or should it return a 404 error? If so, how can I make it
return a 404 error?


itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer





  1. You've already done it; that
    * record covers all names not specifically
    defined.


  2. That message is due to the
    domain being unconfigured, but the users are still getting sent to your server via the
    wildcard DNS entry. If there was no DNS covering that subdomain, then they wouldn't make
    it to your server for cpanel to error or to get a 404 at all; they'd get a browser error
    that the domain could not be
    found.





Since
all requests for subdomains will come to the web server, probably the best way for you
to handle this would be a friendly error page about nothing existing at that
location.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...