Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Understand ssl setup

itemprop="text">

Goals:




  • If
    the user support SNI and hit myurl1.server.com (https) or myurl2.server.com (https) it
    will match the right vhost. (the last 2 vhosts)

  • If the
    user does not support SNI and hit myurl1.server.com (https) or myurl2.server.com (https)
    it will be catch by the fallback vhost (the first on port 443). It contains the SAN
    certificate and it will hit the server again to do the match. This time it will hit the
    last 2 vhost.

  • If the user enter an unknown url with
    either http or https it will be catch in the first vhost that show a error
    page.




I have
tested all 3 goals and it's working
fine.



Questions:




  • When
    the user is hitting the SAN vhost (https) which make a new request to it self. How does
    Apache know it will match the last 2 vhost (443) when the proxypass in SAN vhost is
    using http(80)

  • When the user is hitting the SAN vhost I
    can't see any requests in the SAN access log. The requests only appears in the last 2
    vhost even if it goes through the SAN vhost. However I can see some bot requests in the
    SAN access
    log.




The code
only contains the important
parts.



NameVirtualHost
*:80
NameVirtualHost *:443

*:80>
show error
page



*:443>
SSLCertificateFile san.crt
CustomLog san-access.log

ProxyPass / http://my-local-url-server/
ProxyPassReverse /
http://my-local-url-server/


*:443>
ServerName myurl1.server.com
SSLCertificateFile
myurl1.crt

CustomLog myurl1-access.log
ProxyPass /
http://mybackend1/
ProxyPassReverse /
http://mybackend1/


*:443>
ServerName myurl2.server.com
SSLCertificateFile
myurl2.crt
CustomLog myurl2-access.log
ProxyPass /
http://mybackend2/

ProxyPassReverse /
http://mybackend2/



Answer




The confusion here is between SSL negotiation and apache vhost handling. This
is what happens:



If a user connects without
supporting SNI, Apache can't at first know which vhost the user wants, since the host
name is hidden within the SSL encryption. So apache will use the first SSL certificate
it finds for the SSL negotiation. Once the client has accepted that certificate and
finished the negotiation, then Apache will be able to decrypt the request and handle it
just as if the client had been supported SNI from the
start.



So there is never any HTTP request to the
SAN server - there's just an SSL negotiation which uses the certificate from the SAN
server before figuring out which vhost to use for the HTTP request. Apache logs only the
HTTP requests, not the SSL negotiations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able