Skip to main content

apache 2.2 - Understand ssl setup



Goals:




  • If the user support SNI and hit myurl1.server.com (https) or myurl2.server.com (https) it will match the right vhost. (the last 2 vhosts)

  • If the user does not support SNI and hit myurl1.server.com (https) or myurl2.server.com (https) it will be catch by the fallback vhost (the first on port 443). It contains the SAN certificate and it will hit the server again to do the match. This time it will hit the last 2 vhost.

  • If the user enter an unknown url with either http or https it will be catch in the first vhost that show a error page.




I have tested all 3 goals and it's working fine.



Questions:




  • When the user is hitting the SAN vhost (https) which make a new request to it self. How does Apache know it will match the last 2 vhost (443) when the proxypass in SAN vhost is using http(80)

  • When the user is hitting the SAN vhost I can't see any requests in the SAN access log. The requests only appears in the last 2 vhost even if it goes through the SAN vhost. However I can see some bot requests in the SAN access log.




The code only contains the important parts.



NameVirtualHost *:80
NameVirtualHost *:443


show error page




SSLCertificateFile san.crt
CustomLog san-access.log
ProxyPass / http://my-local-url-server/
ProxyPassReverse / http://my-local-url-server/



ServerName myurl1.server.com
SSLCertificateFile myurl1.crt

CustomLog myurl1-access.log
ProxyPass / http://mybackend1/
ProxyPassReverse / http://mybackend1/



ServerName myurl2.server.com
SSLCertificateFile myurl2.crt
CustomLog myurl2-access.log
ProxyPass / http://mybackend2/

ProxyPassReverse / http://mybackend2/


Answer



The confusion here is between SSL negotiation and apache vhost handling. This is what happens:



If a user connects without supporting SNI, Apache can't at first know which vhost the user wants, since the host name is hidden within the SSL encryption. So apache will use the first SSL certificate it finds for the SSL negotiation. Once the client has accepted that certificate and finished the negotiation, then Apache will be able to decrypt the request and handle it just as if the client had been supported SNI from the start.



So there is never any HTTP request to the SAN server - there's just an SSL negotiation which uses the certificate from the SAN server before figuring out which vhost to use for the HTTP request. Apache logs only the HTTP requests, not the SSL negotiations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...