Skip to main content

ssd - The setup of S2D that delivers up to 2M IOPS to SQL FCI



We are about to deploy shared storage researching for ultra-fast storage to implement Microsoft SQL Server Failover Cluster (FCI). So far the project goes, we would to start with 500K IOPS for 8k blocks about 70r/30w pattern.
Also we would like to have an ability to encrease pefromance up to 2M IOPS (for same pattern) in a year or so, due to the SQL server growing expectations.




For the purpose of the project, we are going to deploy 4-node cluster of Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct (S2D). As for hardware we already have 2x Dell rack servers R730xd with 2x E5-2697 and 512GB RAM and we are ready to get 2 more.



As for storage, Microsoft recommends going with NVMe or NVMe + SSD to obtain maximum performance (source). Therefore, after some research, Samsung SSDs are good to go with. https://www.starwindsoftware.com/blog/benchmarking-samsung-nvme-ssd-960-evo-m-2 http://www.storagereview.com/samsung_960_pro_m2_nvme_ssd_review



The setup we consider is following: 1x Samsung 960 EVO NVMe + 4x Samsung PM863 SSD per S2D host.



Can S2D implementation using Samsung 960 EVO NVMe and Samsung PM863 deliver 500k to SQL FCI?



EDIT:




a) didn't you ask something similar the other day? -
I did. A new question was posted since the first shot was off-topic. Subject and body are changed. Previous question will be deleted.



b) they're consumer drives, -
The question is about to find the setup of S2D that could house required 500k IOPS on start. What setup would you recommend?



c) how are you planning on connecting all of those, I'm unaware of a server out there with 5 x M.2 slots - we need to know this, - Only 1x M.2 drive per each node is to be used. I have corrected the setup of shared storage: 1x Samsung 960 EVO NVMe + 4x Samsung PM863 SATA SSD per S2D host.



d) what kind of IOPSs (size and type)? -

SQL FCI read intensive workload of 4k, 8k, 64k blocks. Reads range is 70-90% and writes one - 30-10%.



e) 500k-to-2M is a very wide range of requirement variance - why such a wide range? -
The project performance is expected to significantly grows in sort period, so we must have ability to run 4x workload on same hardware till the and of the first year. A year after we will add 4x more hosts to cluster.



We are Microsoft Shop so there is no option to go eslewhere but Microsoft SQL Server 2016. Also, as you might consume the project requires redundancy and extra availability therefore SQL Failover Cluster Intance will be deployed aside S2D.


Answer



It's a bad idea to use consumer SSDs in your SDS deployments. VMware VSAN and Microsoft S2D both assume writes will be "atomic", so one ACK-ed by host is actually on persistent memory; consumer SSDs don't have any power outage protection so they MIGHT lose your data. Write endurance is also very different.



https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/filecab/2016/11/18/dont-do-it-consumer-ssd/




https://blogs.vmware.com/vsphere/2013/12/virtual-san-hardware-guidance-part-1-solid-state-drives.html



http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2013/09/16/frequently-asked-questions-virtual-san-vsan/



I'd suggest to stick with some Enterprise-grade NVMe cards.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

linux - How can I get my mediawiki to stop thinking I have cookies disabled?

I've searched half a day for how to resolve this issue, and can't figure it out. Shortly after I made my wiki a simple private wiki according to the instructions at Mediawiki's website, it started giving me this weird login error message: Wiki uses cookies to log in users. You have cookies disabled. Please enable them and try again. If I remove those private wiki settings, the error disappears, even if I try logging in. But I need it to be a private wiki for only my team. So what do I do? Here's what I've done so far. Just to be safe, after ever change, I try rebooting Apache using: sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart In my php.ini file, I have the following set: session.save_path = "/var/lib/php5" session.cookie_secure = secure session.cookie_path = /tmp session.cookie_domain = my server's internal URL (should I even set this? this field was blank before, but not commented out) session.referer_check = Off I ran the following to ensure that the fold...