Skip to main content

raid - Use of 2.5" Laptop Drives in a Server?

itemprop="text">

We're acquiring several 1U servers
with (8) 2.5" drive slots. Although we can use either SATA or SAS, there is a large
price variance as soon as you order 16 or 24 of these drives, so we are looking at the
2.5" SATA interfaced drives.



I know that Seagate
and WD both make "Enterprise" 2.5" drives, which are fast (10k and 15k RPM), but are
also fairly expensive.



What issues would we run
into using 7200RPM 2.5" non-Enterprise drives? By the way, these will be hooked up to a
RAID controller (though, they may just be configured as JBOD). These drives are almost
$100 lower in price, per drive.


class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



In
addition to the problems above, you may have additional issue running these drives in
RAID configuration due to the lack of TLER. (If you are considering a model without.)
This quote references desktops and the RAID Edition drives but I imagine the same to be
true in the 2.5" line if you substitute in "notebook" and "enterprise" or "SAS" where
applicable.






Western Digital manufactures desktop edition hard drives and RAID Edition hard
drives. Each type of hard drive is designed to work specifically in either a desktop
computer environment or a demanding enterprise environment.




If you install and use a desktop edition hard drive connected to a
RAID controller, the drive may not work correctly unless jointly qualified by an
enterprise OEM. This is caused by the normal error recovery procedure that a desktop
edition hard drive uses.



When an error is
found on a desktop edition hard drive, the drive will enter into a deep recovery cycle
to attempt to repair the error, recover the data from the problematic area, and then
reallocate a dedicated area to replace the problematic area. This process can take up to
2 minutes depending on the severity of the issue. Most RAID controllers allow a very
short amount of time for a hard drive to recover from an error. If a hard drive takes
too long to complete this process, the drive will be dropped from the RAID array. Most
RAID controllers allow from 7 to 15 seconds for error recovery before dropping a hard
drive from an array. Western Digital does not recommend installing desktop edition hard
drives in an enterprise environment (on a RAID controller).




Western Digital RAID edition hard drives have a feature called TLER
(Time Limited Error Recovery) which stops the hard drive from entering into a deep
recovery cycle. The hard drive will only spend 7 seconds to attempt to recover. This
means that the hard drive will not be dropped from a RAID array. Though TLER is designed
for RAID environments, it is fully compatible and will not be detrimental when used in
non-RAID environments.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more