Skip to main content

Swapping older Samsung Enterprise SSD for Consumer SSD (EVO 850) in Dell PowerEdge R820 server in RAID 5 configuration?

I work for a nonprofit organization that contracts with a
local IT outfit. We are currently using three enterprise SSD drives in our Dell
PowerEdge R820 rig, set up in a RAID 5 configuration. We have been having discussions
about upping our capacity to at least 1 TB (possibly 2 TB), because we always seem to be
up against our capacity limit as things stand
now.



The contracted IT outfit has recommended
three Samsung SM863 SATA 1.92TB (Enterprise) drives to replace the current drives. Their
cost on the drives was going to bring our total to around $6,000 (not including labor).
Of course, you can buy these drives direct from Samsung for $1,260. This is where my
mistrust of this recommendation began to grow, as a $1,000 price difference from OEM
versus the IT outfit is very odd to say the least.



I've done a bit of research and found that when
it comes to solid state, the enterprise drives have about the same median lifespan as
the consumer level drives, like the Samsung EVO 850 1TB, which sell for considerably
less money (around $300 each) or Samsung PRO 850 1TB ($400). The median lifespan on the
850 EVO 1.5 million hours versus the enterprise level, which are 2 million hours. The
850 PRO has 2 million hours.



These are a few of
the articles I found about Enterprise versus
Consumer:




href="https://www.backblaze.com/blog/enterprise-drive-reliability/" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">https://www.backblaze.com/blog/enterprise-drive-reliability/



href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2687068/consumer-drives-shown-to-be-more-reliable-than-enterprise-drives.html"
rel="nofollow
noreferrer">http://www.computerworld.com/article/2687068/consumer-drives-shown-to-be-more-reliable-than-enterprise-drives.html



The
guy we contract with for IT is totally against using anything less than Enterprise-level
drives in our server. We currently have about 30 computers in our facility that are
connected to the server at any given time.



My
question is, what should we as a non-profit do in this situation? We have the ultimate
authority over what hardware we use because we own the server. Should we go against the
advice of our contracted tech and go with EVO or PRO drives or will we regret it down
the line?



Given the price differences, we CAN
afford to keep a couple of EVO or PRO drives as backup in case the drives fail. We could
NOT do that with the Enterprise drives (if we can afford them at all), since they are
$1,200 each.




We can buy any of the
drives direct from Samsung and get the OEM warranty of three years for EVO or 10 years
for PRO that come with them, too.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more