Skip to main content

domain name system - Dns - wildcard vs. cname subdomains

itemprop="text">

Alright I have to admit I'm confused
with how DNS works. I've always just added things until they worked, and now it's time
to learn how they work.



So one confusing thing
to me is that there's sort of two places I can have records. I have an account with
rackspace cloud servers. And then there's the place I registered the domain. But both
allow me to edit DNS records.




Should
I do everything at both places or is one better than the other or am I missing the
point?



Subdomains confuse me too. I'd like to be
able to just have a wildcard subdomain (I've done this in the past.) I just don't like
the idea of adding a cname record or A record every time I need a new
subdomain.



Then I read href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildcard_DNS_record" rel="nofollow
noreferrer">this and it
says:




The exact
rules for when a wild card will match are specified in RFC 1034, but the rules are
neither intuitive nor clearly specified. This has resulted in incompatible
implementations and unexpected results when they are
used.



class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer





The first thing you need to do is determine who actually serves authoritative
answers for your domain name. A WHOIS lookup will tell you which DNS servers are the
ones where you should be making changes.



Once
that is determined, make the changes with the provider listed and get rid of everything
else to avoid any future confusion.



Regarding
wildcards vs. hostnames, do whatever you're comfortable with. In general, most DNS
implementations will look for a hostname that's been specifically defined (i.e. an
A record that directs to a specific IP address) and will fall
back to a wildcard if none is found. Personally, I prefer to define each of my records
individually. This way I know what I have and where it goes without any questions.
Wildcards can be great if you have 300 hostnames that all need to go to the same place
and they change all the time. If you only have a handful of hostnames and they don't
change often, I'd opt for setting them up
individually.



If you have a dozen hostnames that
all need to go to the same IP, you can define one of them as an
A record, and make the rest CNAME
aliases of the first one. This way, you only need to update that IP address
once.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?
Post a Comment
Read more

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,
Post a Comment
Read more

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able
Post a Comment
Read more