Skip to main content

ZFS delete snapshots with interdependencies and clones

itemprop="text">

Below is my list of ZFS volumes and
snapshots, as well as the origin and clone for
each.



I want to delete all the
snapshots, but keep all the filesystems.
How can I do
this?




I have tried zfs
promote
followed by attempting to delete each filesystem for many different
combinations of the filesystems. This shifts around where the snapshots "live"; for
instance, zfs promote tank/containers/six moves snapshot
F from tank/containers/three@F to
tank/containers/six@F. The live data in the filesystem isn't
modified (which is what I want!), but I still can't delete the snapshot (which is not
what I want).



A typical zfs
destroy
attempt tells me it has dependent clones, some of which (the
snapshots) I do want to destroy, but others of which (the
filesystems) I do not want to
destroy.



For
example.



# zfs destroy
tank/containers/six@A
cannot destroy 'tank/containers/six@A': snapshot has
dependent clones
use '-R' to destroy the following
datasets:

tank/containers/five
tank/containers/two@B
tank/containers/two


In
the above example, I don't want to destroy tank/containers/five
or tank/containers/two, but if I zfs
promote
five and two, I still can't destroy any snapshots. Is there a
solution?



# zfs list -t all -o
name,origin,clones
NAME ORIGIN CLONES
tank -
-

tank/containers - -
tank/containers/five
tank/containers/two@B -
tank/containers/four tank/containers/six@C
-
tank/containers/one - -
tank/containers/one@E -
tank/containers/three
tank/containers/two tank/containers/six@A
-
tank/containers/two@B - tank/containers/five
tank/containers/six
tank/containers/three@F -
tank/containers/six@A -
tank/containers/two
tank/containers/six@C -
tank/containers/four

tank/containers/three tank/containers/one@E
-
tank/containers/three@F -
tank/containers/six

class="post-text" itemprop="text">
class="normal">Answer



AFAIK
you're going to have to copy those datasets out to new, independent datasets. Promotion
just switches around which dataset is "parent" vs "child", it doesn't actually break any
dependencies if you want to keep both.



Eg:



root@box~# zfs snapshot
tank/containers/six@1
root@box~# zfs send tank/containers/six@1 | pv | zfs
receive tank/containers/newsix

root@box~# zfs destroy -R
tank/containers/six
root@box~# zfs destroy tank/containers/three@F

root@box~# zfs rename tank/containers/newsix
tank/containers/six


Take
your time and be sure of what you're doing. Especially with the actual
deletions.



This replication is block-for-block,
so if there's any significant data in there it WILL take a while. The
pv part is strictly optional, but will give you a progress bar
to look at while you wait.



Also maybe consider
syncoid to
automate the replication tasks, now and in the future. (Obligatory: I am the original
author of this tool, which is GPLv3 licensed and free to
use.)



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

ubuntu - Monitoring CPU, Mem, disk, on a single server

I've been looking for a simple starter solution for monitoring my [currently] single server hosted solution. Other than Nagios and similar, are there other good (simple) solutions people are using? Answer Everything depends on what you want. For example Munin is very simple, you can install and configure it in less then 10 minutes (on one server), it can sends alarms, make graphs from monitoring cpu, mem. apache connections, eaccellerator, disk io and many many more (it has many plugins). But if you are planning in future get some more machines, munin may not be enough. For example in munin you cant monitor state of individual processes, can't monitor changes in files (for security purpose). So if you wanna only see what is the utilization of basics parameters on your server and don't plan to buy some more servers Munin is what you are looking for, but if you wanna be alarmed when some of your service is down, take more control on what is happeninig on...

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...