Skip to main content

networking - Realistic Network Load Testing

I am trying to benchmark an ASA under various conditions but what is throwing me off is my baseline seems to be odd. I am trying to load an ASA to full capacity. See the attached topology diagram:




Topology



The players are:




  • C1 a Linux client runs a continuous download of a 300 GB file and loops this from S1, a Linux server running HTTPD.

  • C2 a Linux client also runs a continuous download of a 300 GB file and loops this from S2, a Linux server running HTTPD.

  • C3 runs AB to try and generate more connections. ab -n100 -c99999999 http://10.0.0.57/ This is to S3, a Linux server running HTTPD.

  • Cisco ASA 5520 running 8.4.




What I found odd was that even with all this going on the max I saw was just over 500 Mbps (observed via NLOAD on both VM box physical interfaces). Is this normal? Everything is Gig. Some questions:




  • Is it likely that my crappy Linux desk switch is bottlenecking?

  • Does NATing really kill performance that bad or is something else going on? The CPU on the Dispatch Process was 30% under load.

  • Is this is likely a disk issue as the servers are simply reading the file as fast as they can?

  • What I found odd was that C1 would not transfer at it's full speed until I had it download 3 copies of the file from S1 at once (about 250 Mbps at this point). Why are 3 parallel downloads from S1 faster than a single download? Shouldn't S1 send as quick as it possibly can?




Is there a better way to load test network equipment. Downloading a single large file does not seem realistic. I am trying to simulate a busy network doing web things and load the ASA to capacity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - Awstats - outputting stats for merged Access_logs only producing stats for one server's log

I've been attempting this for two weeks and I've accessed countless number of sites on this issue and it seems there is something I'm not getting here and I'm at a lost. I manged to figure out how to merge logs from two servers together. (Taking care to only merge the matching domains together) The logs from the first server span from 15 Dec 2012 to 8 April 2014 The logs from the second server span from 2 Mar 2014 to 9 April 2014 I was able to successfully merge them using the logresolvemerge.pl script simply enermerating each log and > out_putting_it_to_file Looking at the two logs from each server the format seems exactly the same. The problem I'm having is producing the stats page for the logs. The command I've boiled it down to is /usr/share/awstats/tools/awstats_buildstaticpages.pl -configdir=/home/User/Documents/conf/ -config=example.com awstatsprog=/usr/share/awstats/wwwroot/cgi-bin/awstats.pl dir=/home/User/Documents/parced -month=all -year=all...

iLO 3 Firmware Update (HP Proliant DL380 G7)

The iLO web interface allows me to upload a .bin file ( Obtain the firmware image (.bin) file from the Online ROM Flash Component for HP Integrated Lights-Out. ) The iLO web interface redirects me to a page in the HP support website ( http://www.hp.com/go/iLO ) where I am supposed to find this .bin firmware, but no luck for me. The support website is a mess and very slow, badly categorized and generally unusable. Where can I find this .bin file? The only related link I am able to find asks me about my server operating system (what does this have to do with the iLO?!) and lets me download an .iso with no .bin file And also a related question: what is the latest iLO 3 version? (for Proliant DL380 G7, not sure if the iLO is tied to the server model)

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits, ...