Skip to main content

linux - How much memory can I lock before the system starts swapping/thrashing?

I'm trying to use Memtester as a memory stress and correctness test for my organization's Linux boxes. Memtester basically just takes in an amount of memory to test as an argument, locks that much memory using memlock(), and then runs a number of patterns to verify that the memory is good.



Since I'm trying to verify correctness, I want to be testing as much of the machine's memory as possible. I've been trying to do this by passing it MemFree from /proc/meminfo. Or rather, I have a script that spawns multiple processes, each asking for MemFree (see below), because the OS doesn't allow a single process to lock more than 50% of memory.



The problem is, if I lock more than ~90% of memory, my computer locks up, presumably due to thrashing. About 30 minutes later I'm finally able to use it again.



Is there a way, programmatically or otherwise, to find out how much memory I can lock before it starts swapping?




I want this to run on any Linux box, so anything that requires me to change the system configuration is a no-go. Also, you can assume that the test will be the only thing running on the system (besides normal OS stuff, of course), since the machines are supposed to be left alone while we're stress testing them.






part of the script that spawns memtester processes



    while [ $MEMAVAILABLE -ge 0 ] 
do
./memtester $MEMAVAILABLE'K' &
sleep 10 #wait for previous process to lock its memory

MEMFREE=`cat /proc/meminfo | grep "MemFree" | sed 's/MemFree:\(\s\)*\(.*\) kB/\2/g'`
MEMAVAILABLE=$(($MEMFREE-($MEMTOTAL*5/100)))
done
wait


.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able