Skip to main content

domain name system - Internal and External DNS from Different Servers, Same Zone



I am either having trouble understanding how DNS works, or I am having trouble configuring my DNS correctly (either one isn't good). I am currently working with a domain, I'll call it webdomain.com, and I need to allow all of our internal users to get out to dotster to get our public DNS entries just like the rest of the world. Then, on top of that, I want to be able to supply just a few override DNS entries for testing servers and equipment that is not available publically. As an example:




  • public.webdomain.com - should get this from dotster

  • outside.webdomain.com - should get this from dotster as well


  • testing.webdomain.com - should get this from my internal dns controller





The problem that I seem to be running into at every turn is that if I have an internal DNS controller that contains a zone for webdomain.com then I can get my specified internal entries but never get anything from the public DNS server. This holds true regardless of the type of DNS server I use also--I have tried both a Linux Bind9 and a Windows 2008 Domain Controller.



I guess my big question is: am I being unreasonable to think that a system should be able to check my specified internal DNS and in the case where a requested entry doesn't exist it should fail over to the specified public dns server -OR- is this just not the way DNS works and I am lost in the sauce?



It seems like it should be as simple as telling my internal DNS server to forward any requests that it can't fulfill to dotster, but that doesn't seem to work. Could this be a firewall issue?



Thanks in advance




EXTENDED



OK, so I did a bunch of research and have been plugging at this for a few hours. I have this in my named.conf and I am STILL seeing the same result. Internal calls are fed, but anything external (in the zone controlled domain) is just dumped. Any assistance would be great! Also, this is an Ubuntu 9.04 OS I am working with.



Code removed because it was wrong.


THE CORRECT WAY -- ADDED AFTER QUESTION CLOSED



Well, thanks to the folks here on serverfault I now have this working perfectly on my server and in a much more succinct fashion. Here is how you do it. From a base install of bind9 edit your named.conf.local file and add in a zone for EACH subdomain that you want to redirect:




/etc/bind/named.conf



// WEBDOMAIN.COM ENTRIES
zone "test.webdomain.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/test.webdomain.com";
};

zone "alpha.webdomain.com" {

type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/alpha.webdomain.com";
};

zone "beta.webdomain.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/beta.webdomain.com";
};

// INTERNETSITE.COM ENTRIES

zone "internal.internetsite.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/internal.internetsite.com";
};

zone "dev.internetsite.com" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/zones/dev.internetsite.com";
};



Edit your /etc/bind/named.conf.options file and add any forwarders you want to use into the correct location:



/etc/bind/named.conf.options



options {
directory "/var/cache/bind";

forwarders {
208.67.222.222;

208.67.220.220;
8.8.8.8;
8.8.4.4;
};

auth-nxdomain no; # conform to RFC1035
listen-on-v6 { any; };
};



Create a new folder called zones at /etc/bind/zones/ and add a new file for EACH of the zones you created above that match the 'file' attribute above. Using test.webdomain.com as an example:



/etc/bind/zones/test.webdomain.com



$TTL    604800
@ IN SOA test.webdomain.com. (
1 ; Serial
604800 ; Refresh
86400 ; Retry
2419200 ; Expire

604800 ) ; Negative Cache TTL
;
@ IN NS test.webdomain.com.
test.webdomain.com. IN A 10.0.1.20


Where 10.0.1.20 is the A record ip address that you want this (sub)domain to forward to. By doing it this way the record for test.webdomain.com is authoritative for only the subdomain and the global DNS will supply any other subdomains or root domains as usual.


Answer



What you'll want to do is create a DNS zone for testing.webdomain.com on your internal DNS server. This way the webdomain.com DNS isn't hosted by your internal server, but is instead hosted by dotster.




When someone queries for www.webdomain.com the request will be forwarded to dotster for the lookup (since your local DNS server isn't authoritative for that zone), while requests for testing.webdomain.com will be handled by your internal DNS server.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

linux - iDRAC6 Virtual Media native library cannot be loaded

When attempting to mount Virtual Media on a iDRAC6 IP KVM session I get the following error: I'm using Ubuntu 9.04 and: $ javaws -version Java(TM) Web Start 1.6.0_16 $ uname -a Linux aud22419-linux 2.6.28-15-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Mon Aug 31 13:39:06 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ firefox -version Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14, Copyright (c) 1998 - 2009 mozilla.org On Windows + IE it (unsurprisingly) works. I've just gotten off the phone with the Dell tech support and I was told it is known to work on Linux + Firefox, albeit Ubuntu is not supported (by Dell, that is). Has anyone out there managed to mount virtual media in the same scenario?

hp proliant - Smart Array P822 with HBA Mode?

We get an HP DL360 G8 with an Smart Array P822 controller. On that controller will come a HP StorageWorks D2700 . Does anybody know, that it is possible to run the Smart Array P822 in HBA mode? I found only information about the P410i, who can run HBA. If this is not supported, what you think about the LSI 9207-8e controller? Will this fit good in that setup? The Hardware we get is used but all original from HP. The StorageWorks has 25 x 900 GB SAS 10K disks. Because the disks are not new I would like to use only 22 for raid6, and the rest for spare (I need to see if the disk count is optimal or not for zfs). It would be nice if I'm not stick to SAS in future. As OS I would like to install debian stretch with zfs 0.71 as file system and software raid. I have see that hp has an page for debian to. I would like to use hba mode because it is recommend, that zfs know at most as possible about the disk, and I'm independent from the raid controller. For us zfs have many benefits,

apache 2.2 - Server Potentially Compromised -- c99madshell

So, low and behold, a legacy site we've been hosting for a client had a version of FCKEditor that allowed someone to upload the dreaded c99madshell exploit onto our web host. I'm not a big security buff -- frankly I'm just a dev currently responsible for S/A duties due to a loss of personnel. Accordingly, I'd love any help you server-faulters could provide in assessing the damage from the exploit. To give you a bit of information: The file was uploaded into a directory within the webroot, "/_img/fck_uploads/File/". The Apache user and group are restricted such that they can't log in and don't have permissions outside of the directory from which we serve sites. All the files had 770 permissions (user rwx, group rwx, other none) -- something I wanted to fix but was told to hold off on as it wasn't "high priority" (hopefully this changes that). So it seems the hackers could've easily executed the script. Now I wasn't able